|
Muslim leaders
air concern
COTABATO
CITY, Philippines—Islamic leaders from around the world have expressed concern for the plight of the people affected
by the fighting in Mindanao.
This as
12 more suspected Moro rebels were killed by Army soldiers in almost three days of clashes in the region.
Eid Kabalu,
Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) civil military affairs chief, told the Philippine Daily Inquirer by phone that members
of the World Islamic Call Society, a nonprofit organization established in 1970, hoped the security problem in Mindanao would
soon be resolved peacefully.
The society
has for its members some 400 Islamic institutions and other groups on all the continents.
Kabalu,
along with Moro National Liberation Front Chair Muslimin Sema and Vice Chair Hatilim Hassan, returned to the Philippines recently
from the World Islamic Call Society conference held in Tripoli, Libya, on October 27-30.
“They
are concerned with the situation in Mindanao as well the condition of the evacuees,” Kabalu said on his arrival in Manila.
The fighting
since August between the military and rouge MILF elements has affected more than 600,000 people, many of whom remain in evacuation
centers.
Scores
have been killed on both sides, businesses have been ruined and lives uprooted following the aborted signing of an agreement
between the government and the MILF that would have created an expanded homeland for the Moro people.
In the
latest clashes, at least 12 suspected Moro rebels were killed in fighting that erupted Sunday night in Datu Saudi Ampatuan
town after followers of MILF Commander Aneril Ombra Kato tried to regain control of their camp that was captured by the military
last month.
Jeoffrey Maitem, Inquirer Mindanao
First posted 23:20:12 (Mla time) November 04, 2008 Philippine Daily Inquirer
________________________________________________________________________
Govt
to present outdated report on poverty to UN
It may be outrageous, it may be surreal, but the government will declare before the whole world that poverty situation
has improved in the country.
Such could be the distorted message that the Philippine government might send to the United Nations Committee on Economic,
Social and Cultural Rights (UNCESCR) when it talks on how it has kept its commitment to protect the rights of the Filipino
people, a human rights group said Thursday.
In 1976, the Philippine government ratified the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights which gave
the government the responsibility to provide its people access to food, education, adequate housing, decent jobs and healthcare
among others.
Renato Mabunga, secretary-general of the Philippine Alliance of Human Rights Advocates (PAHRA), said the government is
set to present a report on November 11 to 12 that is already outdated and should have been reported before the UN Committee
three years ago.
Every year, the UNCESCR schedules countries who will present their country status reports before the Committee. But according
to Mabunga, every time the table turns to the Philippines, the government always fails to submit a periodic report on time.
The government will send its representatives to Geneva, Switzerland to present a 2006 report, a combination of three reports
which the government was unable to submit in 1995, 2000, and 2005.
“Rosy
economic picture” in ’06 report
“ [The government] is most likely to say it has implemented policies and programs to satisfy social and economic
rights such as access to food, employment, housing, education, and health services,” said the NGO-PO Network for Economic,
Social, and Cultural Rights, an alliance of non-government organizations who came up with an alternative report for the UNCESCR.
In the 2006 report, the government boasted of an average three to five percent growth in key sectors of the economy from
2001 to 2004.
Moreover, the official report said that poverty incidence in the Philippines has gone down to 30.4 percent in 2003, which
according to Bernie Larin of PhilRights is not the real situation of the country at present.
He said the country landed fifth among the world’s most hungry nations with 4 out of 10 Filipinos admitting that
they experience hunger in the past year based from the recent survey of Gallup International.
More
pictures to show
“Almost one-third of our school age children are not in school, 1.84 million for elementary age children and 3.94
million of our youth with ages 12-15. The poor are most likely to drop out of elementary grade compared to the rich families,”
said Celia Soriano of Education Network Philippines.
Medical Actions Group, Inc added that despite the government’s recognition of the Right to Health, access to quality
and affordable healthcare continues to elude the poor families and vulnerable sectors in need of medical aid.
Unlike the claims of the government that the country’s labor force increase from 29.674 million to 34.571 million
since 1998 to 2003, Atty. Joselito S. Calivoso, Jr, Unit Coordinator of Sentro ng Alternatibong Lingap Panligal (Saligan)
said that unemployment in the Philippines has been a perennial problem.
Calivoso also said that the government relies heavily on overseas employment to reduce the number of the unemployed.
NGOs’ report criticized the government’s inability to provide adequate housing while forced evictions continue.
About 48, 432 homes were demolished since 2001 and about 50 percent of the evicted families were not provided relocation.
NGOs
to appear before UNCESCR
Representatives from NGO-PO Network for Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights will also appear before the UNCESCR on November
10 to present their report.
The Committee vowed to consider their report when the government delivers its own report the next day.
In case the UNCESCR shall find the government negligent of its commitments, Mabunga said the Committee cannot press sanctions
on government.
“UNCESCR can only provide recommendations for the government through its concluding observations,” he added.
LILITA BALANE / Newsbreak | 11/07/2008 6:31 PM
as of 11/07/2008 6:31
PM
__________________________________________________________________________________________
RP is
No. 5 in list of hungy nations - report
MANILA, Philippines - An international
survey firm has recently ranked the Philippines as No. 5 among 56 countries worldwide where hunger is prevalent.
GMA news 24 Oras on Tuesday reported that Philippines, based on the Gallup International survey, was
next to number one Cameroon, Pakistan, Nigeria, and Peru.
The report said the survey was conducted by the Voice of the People, a research group of Gallup International.
The report added that the group polled a total of 56,000 respondents in the survey or 1,000 respondents
in each country.
According to report, the group wanted to give the 1.5 billion people in the world who experience hunger
to be heard.
In the Philippines, the report showed an interview with 54-year-old woman in Quezon City who revealed
details of their plight.
The woman sells used clothes while her 61-year-old husband is a tricycle driver. The report said their combined income a day usually amounts to P250 which is not enough to feed her four
children and 16 grandchildren.
“Minsan umiiyak na lang ang asawa ko pagdating nya. Hindi siya makabili ng pagkaing masarap. Kung
Pasko, maniwawala kayo hindi kami makakain ng masarap pero sama-sama lang masaya kami," she said.
An interview with another woman called "Aling Nene" revealed details of a family which lives in a pushcart
and collects garbage for a living. She said that they sometimes do not eat.
Fidel Jimenez, GMANews.TV
11/04/2008
| 10:48 PM
________________________________________________________________________
Interfaith Mission Deplores All-out War,
Humanitarian Crisis in N. Cotabato, Maguindanao
Even as the Arroyo government
publicly declares that it is for peace in Mindanao, a National Interfaith Humanitarian Mission conducted in North Cotabato
and Maguindanao from Oct. 21-24, 2008 concluded that the military offensives purportedly meant to merely pursue Moro Islamic
Liberation Front (MILF) commander Ameril Ombra Kato and his group appear to be part of an all-out war.
The two provinces are among
the foci of renewed fighting between government troops and the MILF.
“The situation in
these provinces is deteriorating continuously, and it has now reached the proportions of a humanitarian crisis,” said
Joel Virador, national vice chairman and former representative of Bayan Muna (People First).
The NIHM*, spearheaded by
Kalinaw Mindanao, went to Pikit, North Cotabato and Datu Piang, Maguindanao.
The two municipalities have
become hosts to persons displaced by the armed conflict in the two provinces. Based on Oct. 2 data from the Department of
Social Welfare and Development (DSWD), in Datu Piang alone there are 9,800 family heads with 50,012 dependents.
Skirmishes
There had been encounters
between government troops and the MILF as early as June 30 in Sitio (sub-village) Maligaya, Barangay (village) Malamote in
Kabacan, North Cotabato.
The next day, another skirmish
took place in Sitio Tubak, Brgy. Pagangan in Aleosan, North Cotabato. The MILF fighters who figured in this firefight were
identified as belonging to the 105th Brigade, led by Commander Ameril Ombra Kato.
The weeks before these incidents
saw massive military deployment to North Cotabato, supposedly to secure the province for the Aug. 11 elections in the Autonomous
Region of Muslim Mindanao (ARMM).
These encounters drove community
residents to evacuate to Brgy. Bagolibas in Aleosan and Brgys. Bual and Nalapaan in Pikit.
Later that same month, armed
men burned some houses in Brgy. Bual and stole a number of farm animals in Brgy. Bagolibas.
On Aug. 2, some 84 houses
in Aleosan were razed to the ground. The government claimed that these burnings were perpetrated by MILF fighters led by Kato.
On Aug. 8, four days after
the Supreme Court’s issuance of a temporary restraining order on the signing of the Memorandum of Agreement on Ancestral
Domain (MoA-AD) between the government and the MILF, the military implemented Oplan Ultimatum and additional troops were positioned
in Pikit, Aleosan, and Midsayap. This, and the dissolution of the government panel in the peace negotiations with the MILF,
served as prelude to the intensification of the fighting in North Cotabato.
While clashes continue in
North Cotabato, the fighting has also spread to nearby Maguindanao.
Military operations have
led residents of affected areas to flee to evacuation centers.
Humanitarian mission
In a statement released
to the media in an Oct. 24 press conference in Cotabato City, the NIHM participants described the evacuees’ situation
thus:
In the evacuation centers,
the displaced persons suffer from inadequate facilities. Most of them have set up tents in whatever public place available.
With heavy rains and flooding now common at this time of year, many child evacuees are sick with cough, cold, fever, and diarrhea.
A number of evacuees have died of disease. There is also the trauma experienced by the evacuees, particularly the children.
Composed of human rights
groups, relief workers, church-based groups, doctors, nurses, students, business groups, human rights advocates, peace advocates
and various cause-oriented groups, the NIHM conducted human rights documentation, psycho-social and medical treatment, and
relief operations for evacuees in Pikit and Datu Piang.
The NIHM documented various
human rights abuses by the military in the two provinces. Violations included a raid in an evacuation center in Aleosan, North
Cotabato. Evacuees interviewed by the NIHM in Pikit and Datu Piang narrated accounts of deaths due to strafing and aerial
bombing, as well as threats and intimidation, torture, abductions, illegal searches and arrests, as well as divestment and
destruction of property.
Among the prominent human
rights violations documented by the NIHM was an Oct. 15 raid on a house, which had served as an evacuation center in Aleosan.
The occupants were beaten up by the raiders, who were identified as elements of the Philippine Army’s 40th Infantry
Battalion. Two of the occupants, Rakman Suleik and his son Samsudin, were taken away and brought to the Aleosan Municipal
Police Office, where Rakman learned that there was a case against him. Samsudin, who delivered a testimony before the entire
NIHM on Oct. 23, insisted that the soldiers who took his father did not show any warrant of arrest. Rakman is still in detention
and there is no clear information on whether or not he has been charged with any offense.
“They had already
evacuated (to escape the military’s atrocities), but even the evacuation center was not spared,” said Karapatan
(Alliance for the Advancement of People’s Rights) secretary-general Marie Hilao-Enriquez.
Meanwhile, the NIHM also
assigned teams to conduct psycho-social treatment for the child evacuees. The psycho-social teams served a total of 214 children,
and found manifestations of trauma in them, including restlessness and disruption of sleeping patterns. In the psycho-social
activities, the children were asked to relate their experience regarding the conflict through sharing, drawings, and role-playing.
The psycho-social teams noted that in their sessions, the children commonly expressed either fear or hatred of soldiers. Their
drawings usually showed fighter planes dropping bombs on houses, the psycho-social teams disclosed.
The medical teams, who served
a total of 192 patients, for its part noted that many of the patients were complaining of ailments that could be attributed
to the conditions in the evacuation centers, such as ever, dizziness, headaches, skin and respiratory infections, and diarrhea.
The NIHM also conducted
relief operations on Oct. 22, benefiting some 766 evacuees in Brgy. Batulawan, Pikit and Brgys. Tee and Poblacion in Datu
Piang.
“All-out war”
The NIHM participants compared
the situation in North Cotabato and Maguindanao to what happened during the all-out wars declared by the Estrada and Arroyo
governments in 2000 and 2003, respectively. Said the participants in their statement:
The military offensives
in North Cotabato and Maguindanao are carried out under the pretext of pursuit operations against Kato and his group, but
these in reality fall within the context of an all-out war. The policy of “disarmament, demobilization and rehabilitation”
(DDR) which is now being carried out by the government shuts the door to peace and leaves all-out war as the main option.
The so-called pursuit operations and “surgical operations” being conducted in North Cotabato and Maguindanao are
characterized by the excessive use of firepower mainly against the civilian populace.
No military personnel have
been called to account for the atrocities against human rights. The military’s tactic has invariably been to divert
the blame for atrocities onto other groups.
The situation in the two
provinces continues to deteriorate and has reached the proportions of a humanitarian crisis. As yet, there appears to be no
end in sight to the miseries of those who have borne the brunt of the fighting.
The interfaith mission recommended
the cessation of military operations in the two provinces. “This is the easiest way by which the evacuees could return
to their homes and rebuild their lives,” said Bagong Alyansang Makabayan (Bayan or New Patriotic Alliance) secretary-general
Renato Reyes, Jr.
Aside from this, the mssion
also recommended that the issues related to the conflict be addressed in the proper forum, particularly the Coordinating Committee
for the Cessation of Hostilities (CCCH), a joint ceasefire monitoring body composed of representatives from both the government
and the MILF. They also called for an independent investigation into human rights abuses perpetrated since the renewed fighting
broke out, indemnification and rehabilitation assistance for the victims of the war, and the resumption of peace negotiations
between the government and the MILF. (Bulatlat)
*The organizations that participated in the NIHM are Bagong Alyansang
Makabayan, Bayan Muna, Gabriela Women’s Party, GABRIELA, Karapatan, Kawagib-Moro Human Rights Organization, Suara Bangsamoro,
Liga ng Kabataang Moro, Initiatives for Peace in Mindanao, Kalumaran, Health Action for Human Rights, Bangsamoro Medical Society,
Ecumenical Mission for Peace and Development, National Council of Churches in the Philippines, Southeast Mindanao Ecumenical
Council, Cotabato Regional Ecumenical Council, Children’s Rehabilitation Center-Southern Mindanao, Kabiba Alliance for
Children’s Concern, Center for Women’s Resource, AlphaSigma Phi-CCSPC (Cotabato City State Polytechnic College)
Chapter, The Torch Publication-CCSPC, Moro Youth Religious Organization, Assumption College of Davao-Social Work Students,
Notre Dame University Peace Center, Notre Dame University College of Nursing, Notre Dame School of Dulawan, United Youth for
Peace and Development, Lay Forum Philippines, United Methodist Church-Mindanao Philippines Annual Conference, Episcopal Diocese
for Southern Philippines, United Church of Christ in the Philippines-Southern Mindanao District Conference, and Holy Cross
of Davao College-Social Work Students.
BY ALEXANDER MARTIN REMOLLINO HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH Bulatlat
PUBLISHED ON October 25, 2008 AT 4:25 PM
________________________________________________________________________
Thousands of Migrants Rally against GFMD
At least 5,000 migrant workers
from different parts of the globe under the banner of the International Migrants Alliance (IMA) held a rally in Manila today
to protest the opening of the Global Forum on Migration and Development (GFMD).
The protesters converged
along Quirino Ave. around 10 a.m. and marched toward the direction of the Philippine International Convention Center (PICC),
venue of the GFMD. Some 300 elements of the Philippine Air Force and the Manila Police District blocked the protesters at
the corner of Quirino Ave. and Mother Ignacia St.
Eni Lestari, chairperson
of IMA and an Indonesian working as a domestic helper in Hong Kong, said, “The GFMD is a meeting of exploiters who are
only after the money of migrant workers. For them, that is the only value of migrant workers. We are nothing, we are not even
human in their eyes.”
Emmanuel Villanueva of Migrante-Hong
kong and Asian Migrants Coordinating Body (AMCB) said,
“It is the global
pimps who have gathered to discuss how to commodify people and how to sell human beings.”
Gabriela Women’s Party
Representative Luzviminda Ilagan said, “They are plotting the future of migrants. They will discuss how to facilitate
remittances but they will not reveal that it will only help their pockets, their governments but not the migrants.”
Villanueva criticized the
GFMD’s agenda. “How can these people talk about the human rights of migrants when they are the exploiters of migrant
workers?” he said.
Villanueva said, “We
are against migration for development because this would mean parents leaving their children and children leaving their parents.
This would mean destruction and separation of families.”
Jossel Ebisate, secretary
general of the Alliance of Health Workers and a nurse at the Philippine General Hospital (PGH) said that most children who
become victims of domestic violence have one or both parents working abroad. He said the same is true with women whose husbands
work overseas.
Zero-remittance
The IMA also led the International
Zero Remittance Day today. Migrant workers from 29 countries heeded the call, said the IMA, including the Philippines, Bangladesh,
Indonesia, Germany, Italy, Belgium, United States, Canada, Fiji,Argentina, South Korea, South Africa, Taiwan, Saudi Arabia,
Japan and Hong Kong.
Lestari said that migrant
workers all over the world take on the difficult and dangerous jobs that even the local people shun. “On top of our
sweat and blood, they do not want to recognize our contributions, our rights as workers and as humans…Let us punish
those governments exploiting us.”
Gil Lebria of Migrante-Middle
East slammed the Arroyo government’s ‘criminal negligence’. Lebria said distressed overseas Filipino workers
receive no help from the Philippine government. He himself has recently been deported by the Kuwait authorities, was also
subjected to torture in Taiwan several years ago.
Development?
Villanueva
said that the concept of migration for development is actually globalization applied to migration. “Forced migration
is an indication of maldevelopment,” said Villanueva.
Lestari deemed that globalization
has failed as it has caused millions of people to get poorer by the day. She said that unemployment and poverty in the Philippines
and Indonesia have worsened through the years even as the two countries rely on dollar remittances of migrant workers.
Lito Ustarez, vice chairperson
of the Kilusang Mayo Uno (KMU-May First Movement) said the Arroyo government cannot find solution to the unemployment. “That
is why the Arroyo government is hosting the GFMD, to promote cheap Philippine labor to other countries.” (Bulatlat.com)
PUBLISHED ON October 29, 2008 AT 10:03 PM
BY BULATLAT
Int’l Mission: Off-shore Mining Violates
Fisherfolk’s Right to Food and Livelihood
An international fact-finding
body, which recently visited communities affected by the offshore oil and gas exploration along the Cebu-Bohol strait, revealed
that the exploration would be detrimental to the livelihood of the fisherfolks in the area.
The offshore mining exploration
is being undertaken by the Department of Energy (DoE) and Australian company, NorAsian Energy Ltd.
Vince Cinches, executive
director of the Central Visayas Fisherfolk Development Center, Inc. (FIDEC) and a delegate of the International Fact-Finding
Mission sponsored by the Pesticide Action Network Asia and the Pacific (PAN AP), revealed that in all the communities they
visited in Pinamungajan, Aloguinsan, Argao and Sibonga, there has been a 70 to 80 percent reduction in fish catch. Because
of the reduction in income, children of many fisherfolks have stopped schooling, while others are getting sick because of
malnutrition.
Other delegates of the IFFM
are Andry Wijaya of Jatam-Indonesia and the Oil Watch Southeast Asia; Teh Chun Hong of PAN AP; Wichoksak Ronnarongpairee and
Busarin Pandit of the Federation of Southern Fisherfolk (Thailand); Gilbert Sape of the People’s Coalition on Food Sovereignty
(PCFS); and, Meggie Nolasco of Kalikasan-People’s Network for the Environment (Philippines).
Cinches, who is also co-convenor
of the environmental group Save Tañon Strait Citizens’ Movement (STSCM) pointed out that the Visayas is the epicenter
of global marine shorefish diversity with the “richest concentration of marine life in the entire planet.”
He said that the presence
of NorAsian or JAPEX, is detrimental to the marine biodiversity in the area as the sonic boom from the air gun used in the
seismic survey would result in damage to the body tissues of marine organisms, including their reproductive systems.
In addition, the noise that
would be made could alter the distribution of fish by tens of kilometers.
“You should keep the
oil underground and let fisherfolks have their means of livelihood,” said Andry Wijaya of Jatam-Indonesia and Oil Watch
Southeast Asia (Indonesia).
Atty. Gloria Estenzo-Ramos
of STSCM asserted that drilling is a violation of the concept of social justice as provided for by the constitution. She added
that the fisherfolks should have the supreme right to the use of fishing grounds.
Cinches said that because
of strong opposition from different local governments in Bohol and the affected communities, NorAsian was forced to transfer
their base of operations in Cebu by mid 2007. He said that Cebuanos should not permit what the Boholanos have rejected.
Paulita Destor of Bol-anong
Kahugpungan sa mga Kabus nga Mananagat (Bokkana-Bohol) said that the exploration along the Cebu-Bohol Strait should be stopped
as this would destroy the rich marine resources of the strait. This in turn would further bring the fisherfolks deeper into
poverty.
Representatives from oil-producing
countries Malaysia and Indonesia claimed that the presence of oil producing companies would not help in the country’s
economy.
“Malaysia is a petroleum
exporting country,” said Teh Chung Hong of Malaysia-based PAN-AP. “Forty percent of our income is from petroleum.
But despite this our country still imposed a forty percent increase in the price of oil. Malaysia’s experience is that
petroleum money will not bring benefit to people, even for oil-producing countries,” he said.
He further cited the example
of Sarawak and Teranganu, which produces most of Malaysia’s oil. He said that these two states are also Malaysia’s
poorest.
In response, Antonio E.
Labios, regional director of the Department of Energy (DoE) Visayas Field Office, said that the claims of the fisherfolks
regarding the reduction in fish catch is yet to be validated and substantiated by scientific studies.
Cinches said that Cebuanos
should not wait for scientific studies to be made for this claim to be substantiated as the experience of the fisherfolks
is enough evidence to prove the ill-effects of the survey.
Labios said that 12 of the
14 barangays of Argao have passed resolutions endorsing the project and that meetings with the mayors of Argao and Sibonga,
as well as that of the governor have shown that they are supportive with the project. “We just have to address the issues
of the fisherfolks,” he said.
However, the four-day IFFM
further discovered that the communities as well as local government officials were not consulted by the mining companies before
entering the seas, in violation of several Philippine laws. It was also disturbed by reports that some local government officials
are involved in unethical relations with the mining companies and that the military has been deployed in certain areas to
intimidate and quell the growing citizens’ movement against off-shore mining.
Labios further claimed that
based on their consultation with the Environmental Management Bureau (EMB) of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
(DENR), an Environmental Compliance Certificate (ECC) is not required for NorAsian to conduct the survey as said document
is only needed once production is started.
Regardless, NorAsian and
JAPEX did their best to comply with environmental guidelines, which includes consultation with various stakeholders, claimed
Labios.
Labios said that they would
soon be signing a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with the Municipalities of Argao and Sibonga so as to lift the recent cease
and desist order imposed by the provincial government of Cebu as per Executive Order No. 09 signed by Governor Gwendolyn Garcia.
Labios said that the purpose
of the seismic survey is to minimize if not eliminate the environmental impact once the oil drilling is started.
“The DoE and the service
contractor do not shy away in addressing the concern of the fisherfolk,” Labios said.
“It is disturbing to know that the Philippine government is hell-bent on pursuing these so-called
energy development projects despite the overwhelming opposition of citizens, especially the poor fisherfolk who are the most
affected. We have seen in Asia and many parts of the globe that at the end of the day, these would only benefit the companies
and corrupt government officials. History shows that oil doesn’t translate to wealth of the people,” said Sape
of the People’s Coalition on Food Sovereignty (PCFS).
BY RITCHE
T. SALGADO Contributor Bulatlat PUBLISHED ON October 25, 2008 AT 5:41 PM
_______________________________________________________________________________________
US Financial Crisis Could Lead to Job Losses
in RP
Just how vulnerable
is the Philippines to the effects of the US financial crisis? Mrs. Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo said the Philippines is equipped
to withstand the effects of the US financial crisis. But a labor economist thinks otherwise, saying the crisis could result,
among other things, in job losses in the Philippines.
Just how vulnerable is the Philippines
to the effects of the US financial crisis – which has been marked among other things by the recent bankruptcies of Fannie
Mae and Freddie Mac, two of the biggest home mortgage loan companies; and Bear Stearns, Merril Lynch, and Lehman Brothers,
three of the biggest financial institutions, in the US?
In her message during the Sept. 18 Philippine
Economic Briefing held in Makati City, Mrs. Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo said the Philippines is equipped to withstand the effects
of the US financial crisis because of its supposedly sound fundamentals, as well as because of the implementation of “tough
economic reforms” that would result in increased revenues.
“The recent challenges we face
are broadly external but they nevertheless require strong, decisive and targeted action internally,” Arroyo said. “The
heights to which oil and other commodity prices have risen were unexpected and the depth of the financial market turbulence
in the US is still unknown. Against this backdrop, the best buffer we have to external vulnerability is our own domestic internal
strength.”
A labor economist, however, has argued
otherwise. Paul Quintos, executive director of the Ecumenical Institute for Labor Education and Research (EILER) and a London
School of Economics (LSE)-trained economist, said the US financial crisis could result, among other things, in job losses
in the Philippines.
Immediate causes of the crisis
To rescue itself from the effects of
stock market overinflation, especially in IT (information technology)-related stocks (i.e., the “dot com bubble”),
the US in 2001 blew the real estate and construction bubble. US financial institutions offered low interest rates for home
mortgage loans: even those with low income or with virtually no collateral were encouraged to apply for home loans. Their
loans, which became known as “subprime mortgages”, accumulated in US financial institutions starting 2001.
To spread the risk exposure of banks
to these subprime mortgages, it underwent a process of “securitization”, in which home mortgage loan packages
were combined with others, packaged and sold as bonds and securities called as collateralized debt obligations (CDOs). These
were guaranteed in credit default swaps (CDS) by insurance companies such as AIG and sold to other banks, financial investment
houses, and companies in the US that deal in speculative investments for its high returns.
However, beginning in the last quarter
of 2006, borrowers – especially those with subprime mortgages – increasingly failed to pay their amortizations.
This caused a ripple of effects on banks and financial investment houses holding both the mortgages and CDOs, as well as those
which issued CDS. This led to a series of bankruptcies of banks and investment houses, which were touted as “too big
to fall”.
The effects of the subprime mortgage
crisis have led to mortgage-credit losses of at least $400 billion, based on estimates by The Economist. The International
Monetary Fund (IMF) estimates a loss of some $945 billion worldwide.
The US credit crunch following the bankruptcies
could lead to recession, Quintos said in an Oct. 2 forum in Quezon City. He added that it could have the effect of contagion
to the rest of the world economy.
Economic impact on the Philippines
Quintos
explained that the Philippines is particularly vulnerable to the effects of the US financial crisis because of its neocolonial
ties to the US. “Neoliberal policies of liberalization of trade, investment and finance; deregulation, privatization,
and others have exacerbated the country’s vulnerability to the crisis of the global capitalist system,” he said.
Quintos
noted that since August 2007, P2 trillion ($42.52 billion at the Oct. 3 exchange rate of $1:P47.04) in stock values have been
wiped out from the Philippine Stock Exchange (PSE). He also cited a 12.3-percent drop in the peso’s strength against
the dollar, and said that the exchange rate is likely to once more reach $1:P50. He said the crisis could lead to tighter
conditions for loans, with higher costs of borrowing and interest rates, and lower capital inflows to the Philippines.
He
also said the crisis could lead to a slump in the export of goods. He noted that around 18 percent of the country’s
exports go directly to the US, while up to 70 percent are indirectly dependent on the US, as well as the European Union or
EU markets, through the export of intermediate goods to TNC (transnational corporation) subcontractors in China, Taiwan, Korea,
the ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations), and others for assembly into final goods.
It
is not only the export of goods that could suffer, he said, but also the export of services. He noted that 90 percent of business
process outsourcing (BPO) revenues comes from the US market.
He
also warned of a possible decline in remittances, considering that 51 percent of remittances from overseas Filipinos are from
the US.
Quintos
also said the crisis could lead to further increases in the prices of food and petroleum products as speculative investments
look for “safe havens” such as commodity futures markets.
The
spike in prices of oil, rice, and wheat in the world market during the first half of the year is being attributed to speculation.
“With
every 10-percent increase in food prices, 2.3 million Filipinos slide below the poverty line, while with every 10-percent
increase in petroleum prices, 160,000 Filipinos slide below the poverty line,” he said.
“All
these mean lower external and internal demand leading to higher unemployment, lower incomes, lower social spending, and higher
taxes in the immediate future,” Quintos said.
He
noted that 1/3 of all manufacturing employment in the country is in export processing zones, which he said would particularly
suffer the consequences of the US financial crisis. He cited the layoffs of 125,000 workers in the manufacturing sector from
July 2007 to July 2008.
Other
areas he cited as likely to be affected by the crisis are small- and medium-scale enterprises (SMEs), construction, wholesale
and retail trade, transportation, agriculture, and BPO firms.
Quintos
said the Arroyo administration is accountable for how the US financial crisis would be affecting the Philippines because of
its “subservience to the US and other foreign monopoly capitalists in exchange for their continued support to the regime
through development and military aid,” as well as for its “aggressive implementation of neoliberal policies for
the interest of foreign capital.”
BY
ALEXANDER MARTIN REMOLLINO LABOR WATCH Bulatlat
________________________________________________________________________
Muslim Leader Concerned Over Role of US troops,
Inclusion of RP in War on Terror
A former
presidential adviser under the Ramos administration and senior fellow of the US Institute of Peace expressed concern over
the involvement of US troops in the war in Mindanao saying that the Philippines should not even be part of the US so-called
“war on terror”.
“We are concerned over the involvement
of US troops in the war in Mindanao.”
Amina Rasul, lead convener of the Philippine
Council for Islam and Democracy, expressed this concern during the Sept. 25 hearing of the Legislative Oversight Committee
on the Visiting Forces Agreement (LOVFA), in which she appeared as a resource person.
Rasul was a Presidential Adviser for
Youth Affairs during the Ramos administration and former senior fellow of the US Institute of Peace.
The LOVFA, headed by Sen. Miriam Defensor
Santiago and Cebu Rep. Antonio Cuenco, conducted the hearing to look into reports that US troops in the Philippines are participating
in actual combat operations.
The Visiting Forces Agreement (VFA) grants
extraterritorial and extrajudicial “rights” to US troops visiting the Philippines. But the Terms of Reference
for RP-US Exercise Balikatan 02-1, which are still being used as guidelines for Philippine and US troops participating in
military exercises, prohibit the participation of US exercise participants in combat operations.
The Constitution prohibits foreign military
presence on Philippine soil except under a treaty approved by both the Philippines and the other contracting party. Art. XVIII,
Sec. 25 of the Constitution provides that:
After the expiration in 1991 of the Agreement
between the Republic of the Philippines and the United States of America concerning military bases, foreign military bases,
troops, or facilities shall not be allowed in the Philippines except under a treaty duly concurred in by the Senate and, when
the Congress so requires, ratified by a majority of the votes cast by the people in a national referendum held for that purpose,
and recognized as a treaty by the other contracting State.
The VFA was ratified by the Philippine
Senate in 1999 and signed by then President Joseph Estrada. It was, however, never ratified by the US Senate.
While not taking any position supporting
or opposing the VFA, Rasul expressed apprehension that the presence of US troops in the Philippines could involve the country
in a war in which it should have no part. “Our worry is that we may become part of the global war on ‘terror’,
and we are not part of that,” Rasul said.
Roland Simbulan, a development studies
professor at the University of the Philippines (UP) in Manila and an expert on RP-US foreign and military relations, had expressed
a similar view in an earlier interview with Bulatlat. “With the presence of US troops in our country, we can get into
conflict with countries that are not our enemies,” he said.
According to former Gen. Edilberto Adan,
chairman of the Presidential Commission on the VFA, there are 400-600 US troops deployed in the Philippines at any one time.
US troops in the Philippines operate
from what are known as “Cooperative Security Locations” or CSLs. The website GlogalSecurity.org defines a CSL
as follows:
A Cooperative Security Location (CSL)
is a host-nation facility with little or no permanent US presence. CSLs will require periodic service, contractor and/or host
nation support. CSLs provide contingency access and are a focal point for security cooperation activities. They may contain
propositioned equipment. CSLs are: rapidly scalable and located for tactical use, expandable to become a FOS (Forward Operating
Site), forward and expeditionary. They will have no family support system.
In the Philippines, there are CSLs installed
in Camp Aguinaldo, the General Headquarters of the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP); as well as in Camp Navarro in Zamboanga
City, in Cotabato City, and in Basilan.
Camp Navarro hosts the headquarters of
the Joint Special Operations Task Force-Philippines (JSOTF-P).
The JSOTF-P was established by the US
Special Operations Command Pacific (SOCPAC). It began its work when SOCPAC deployed to the Philippines Joint Task Force (JTF)
510. Based on an item on GlobalSecurity.org, JTF 510 was deployed to the Philippines “to support Operation Enduring
Freedom.”
Operation
Enduring Freedom is the official name given to the US government’s military response to the terrorist attack of Sept.
11, 2001 in New York City. It entails a series of anti-“terrorism” activities in Afghanistan, the Philippines,
the Horn of Africa, Trans-Sahara, and Pakinsi Gorge.
Adan
said at the Sept. 25 hearing that majority of US troops’ activities in the Philippines are “humanitarian and civic
actions.”
A
similar claim was expressed at the same hearing by Sulu Gov. Abdulsakur Tan, a supporter of the VFA, who said, “American
forces have been helping in civic, social, and economic activities.”
However,
a June 2006 article by Robert D. Kaplan – an American journalist who has been a consultant to the US Army’s Special
Forces Regiment, the US Marines, and the US Air Force – even “humanitarian and civic actions” serve to assist
the war effort. He wrote in a June 2006 article for The Atlantic Monthly that:
I have visited a number of CSLs in East Africa and Asia. Here is how they work. The United States provides
aid to upgrade maintenance facilities, thereby helping the host country to better project its own air and naval power in the
region. At the same time, we hold periodic exercises with the host country’s military, in which the base is a focus.
We also offer humanitarian help to the surrounding area. Such civil-affairs projects garner positive publicity for our military
in the local media – and they long preceded the response to the tsunami, which marked the first time that many in the
world media paid attention to the humanitarian work done all over the world, all the time, by the US military. The result
is a positive diplomatic context for getting the host country’s approval for use of the base when and if we need it.
More
straightforward was Zamboanga City Mayor Celso Lobregat, another VFA supporter, who said that the work of US troops in the
Philippines includes intelligence, which has included the use of unmanned aerial vehicles.
According
to Bagong Alyansang Makabayan (Bayan or New Patriotic Alliance) secretary-general Renato Reyes Jr., intelligence or surveillance
already constitutes participation in combat operations. “We believe that US participation in intelligence work is already
engagement in the armed conflict because it involves the deployment of resources and personnel against a hostile military
target,” the Bayan leader said.
Simbulan
had expressed a similar view in his interview with Bulatlat.
“(It
is part of combat operations because) you identify what your targets are,” Simbulan said. “You do not just attack
with a shotgun approach. You have first to identify your targets.”
Other
purposes of US military presence in the Philippines, Lobregat said, are “winning hearts and minds, supporting effective
communications…and sharing of experience.”
The
first deployment of US troops to the Philippines since the 1991 Senate vote against the extension of the RP-US Military Bases
Agreement took place in 2002, when the Balikatan 02-1 military exercises in Basilan were held. Since then, US troops have
established a continuous presence in the country.
BY
ALEXANDER MARTIN REMOLLINO Bulatlat September
27, 2008 AT 10:08 PM
________________________________________________________________________
Oil flows off Palawan
MANILA, Philippines –
(UPDATE 4) President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo has announced the extraction of fresh oil off Palawan.
"The President is pleased
to announce, as reported by Energy Secretary Angelo Reyes, the extraction of fresh oil from the Galoc oil field in the northwest
offshore of Palawan at 10:45 am today [Thursday]," Executive Secretary Eduardo Ermita told a press conference.
“The President
is optimistic that this new development will positively impact on the administration's efforts to reduce the country's annual
oil importation of US $6 billion, and in turn will also contain the increasing cost of food and other commodities," said Ermita,
reading from a prepared statement.
He also said that this
could translate to $1.4 billion in foreign exchange savings for the Philippines.
Ermita said the President
described the oil from the Galoc field as “light, medium crude oil, with a potential high yield of light ends, such
as gasoline.”
Ermita said the discovery,
to be called Palawan light, was made at 10:45 a.m. Thursday and was put on board a Philippine vessel at 11:20 a.m. to be brought
to local refineries.
Ermita said subject to
further studies, the Galoc oil field is expected to yield from 10 million to 20 million barrels of oil a day, or about six
percent of the national demand of 300,000 barrels a day.
The volume of extract
confirmed early production targets of 17,000 to 20,000 barrels of oil per day in the first 90 days of operation, said Ermita.
A consortium of foreign
and Philippine companies, called Galoc Production Co., is a majority shareholder in the oil field. Otto Energy Limited of
Perth, Australia, an international exploration and production company, has a 31.28 percent stake in the consortium.
Thea Alberto INQUIRER.net October 09, 2008 ________________________________________________________________________________________
Groups Slam Senate ‘Railroading’
of RP-Japan Trade Deal
Two groups opposed to the Japan-Philippines
Economic Partnership Agreement (JPEPA) have condemned what they described as the “railroading” of the treaty last
night at the Senate.
The JPEPA was approved, close to midnight,
with a vote of 16-4. Those who voted “Yes” were Senate President Manuel Villar, Senate President Pro-Tempore Jose
“Jinggoy” Estrada, JPEPA sponsor Miriam Defensor-Santiago, Edgardo Angara, Rodolfo Biazon, Alan Peter Cayetano,
Juan Ponce Enrile, Gregorio Honasan, Panfilo Lacson, Loren Legarda, Ramon Revilla Jr, Manuel Roxas II, Juan Miguel Zubiri,
Richard Gordon and Manuel Lapid. Those who voted “No” were Senate Minority Leader Aquilino Pimentel Jr., Ma. Ana
Consuelo “Jamby” Madrigal, Francis “Chiz” Escudero, and Benigno “Noynoy” Aquino III.
Joker Arroyo and Pia Cayetano were absent
from the voting, while Antonio Trillanes IV is in prison.
In a statement, the NO DEAL! Movement
and the Bagong Alyansang Makabayan (Bayan or New Patriotic Alliance) said they were not surprised that the JPEPA was approved
while the country was not watching.
“This treaty has been negotiated
by Malacañang and signed by Ms. Gloria Arroyo in virtual secrecy,” the two groups said. “The undemocratic and
non-transparent manner with which the deal has been conceived has resulted in a seriously flawed agreement that threatens
to further destroy the jobs and livelihood of Filipino workers, farmers and fishers and further destroy local industries and
stunt long-term economic development.”
These defects of the agreement, as well
as the questionable gains of the treaty such as the supposed increased access of Filipino nurses and health workers to Japan,
had been exposed in Senate hearings, NO DEAL! Movement and Bayan further said.
“The Senate hearings have also
exposed the JPEPA as unconstitutional as it violates the provisions of the 1987 Constitution on foreign ownership and investment
among others,” the two groups added.
They also criticized as “lacking
in nationalist credentials” the senators who voted in favor of the JPEPA, of whom four — Villar, Roxas, Legarda,
and Lacson — had expressed presidential aspirations.
NO DEAL! Movement and Bayan vowed to
use all available means — “from mass protests to the Supreme Court” — to stop the deal’s implementation.
“We believe in economic cooperation
among countries such as through bilateral trade and investment deals,” NO DEAL! Movement and Bayan said. “But
such cooperation must be founded on mutual respect and benefit. JPEPA has completely failed to meet these basic and non-negotiable
requirements.”
BY ALEXANDER MARTIN REMOLLINO Bulatlat October 9, 2008 AT 3:58 PM
_______________________________________________________________________________________
IBON bats for bigger budget for poor amid US meltdown
With the worsening US and global economic crisis expected to aggravate poverty in the country, militant
think tank IBON Foundation pushed Friday for bigger allocations for social services in the P1.41-trillion proposed national
budget for 2009.
In a statement, IBON lamented health gets an "atrociously low" 2.5% of the total budget, education gets
13%, and housing gets 0.4%.
"The perennially low budget allocation for social services will have a deeper repercussion on the poor
and vulnerable sectors as the deteriorating global economic crisis destroys more jobs and livelihood and inflates the cost
of living," it said.
Experts count slowdown in export demand, tighter flows in foreign investments and increased speculation
in food and fuel prices as among the consequences of the US financial crisis.
Thus, it said it becomes more urgent for government to provide sufficient social services such as health,
education and housing.
Yet, it said the proposed budget levels obviously could not cover the expected increased demand for
public schools and hospitals among others.
IBON noted that for the past 10 years, government has been spending an amount equivalent to 2.1% of
the gross domestic product (GDP) for education, way below the international standards of 5% to 6%.
For health, it has been spending only 3.2% of the GDP, lower than the norm set by the World Health Organization
(WHO).
IBON said government should at least meet these levels to alleviate the present condition in the country
seen to worsen with the global crisis.
"To increase spending for social services, government should put a stop to burdensome payments and cut
back on military spending. The proposed budget for 2008 allocates P683 billion for debt principal and interest payment, while
it allocates P5 billion for AFP modernization. In contrast, government allots only P30 million for health care assistance,"
it said.
IBON added the removal of regressive taxes such as the reformed value-added tax (RVAT) on oil is equally urgent
to lessen the inflationary impact of the financial crisis.
The Arroyo government should also abandon its proposal for
new taxes because these will further burden the Filipinos already suffering from low incomes and spiraling cost of living,
it said.
Also, IBON urged the administration not to use the global crisis as an excuse to impose more taxes in
its effort to achieve a balanced budget.
GMANews.TV
10/04/2008 | 06:34 AM
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Oxfam:
Humanitarian crisis in Mindanao is real
A non-government organization has belied Executive Secretary Eduardo Ermita's statement
that there is no humanitarian crisis in the south arising out of collapse of the peace talks between the government and the
separatist Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF).
""The humanitarian needs in Mindanao are real. The armed conflict has caused suffering
for civilians and worsened their experience of poverty," Oxfam country director Lan Mercado said in a statement.
Mercado was reacting to Executive Secretary Eduardo Ermita's brushing aside of the
displaced civilians' situation in areas in Mindanao that are affected by the military's pursuit operations against Moro Islamic
Liberation Front (MILF) fighters.
"We continue to see evacuees who go hungry at shelters, contract diseases, and worry
their future. Civilians live in fear for their safety and lives because of the presence of armed groups in their villages,"
she said, adding that hundreds of children in Mindanao, have stopped going to school because of the hostilities.
Mercado said Oxfam and other non-government organizations (NGO) have been working
with the Philippine government to provide food and safety for the evacuees.
However, she said the combined food aid of several NGOs and government are still
not enough to prevent mothers from risking their lives by returning to their homes to pick vegetables for their hungry children.
She added that several evacuees, mostly farmers, have been forced to sell their
livestock to be able to buy food. Without their farm animals, Oxfam said the evacuees' long-term livelihood recovery is at
risk.
"It is civilians who lose the most in times of conflict. Women, in particular, are
hit the hardest as they take care of the well being of the family amidst uncertainty. They have to constantly worry about
their husbands' and children's safety. Women have to accept odd, sometimes risky, jobs to supplement the family income because
they cannot continue with their usual economic activities that get disrupted by hostilities. Many succumb to stress-related
diseases," Mercado said.
'Not that bad'
The National Disaster Coordinating Council's data said 60, 042 families or 292,977
persons have been displaced by the hostilities. It said only 13,321 families are staying in 104 evacuation centers in at least
three regions in Mindanao.
The agency said the government has released P92.555 million for the relief operations
in Mindanao. The NGOs, meanwhile, have distributed goods worth P17.846 million for the evacuees.
Asked if there is a humanitarian crisis in Mindanao, Ermita told reporters, "There
is none." He said the government can still address the needs of the thousands of evacuees in Mindanao.
The executive secretary also insisted that the humanitarian situation in Mindanao
is "not that bad."
Hostilities in Mindanao heigtened after the government failed to sign a Bangsamoro
homeland deal with the MILF.
Government security forces have been pursuing at least three radical commanders
of the separatist group, who are responsible for civilian attacks in North Cotabato and Lanao provinces.
Government data said 83 people, including dozens of civilians, have been killed
in clashes between the rebels and the military.
abs-cbnNEWS.com | 09/27/2008 9:29 AM
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
'Nothing
mutual about RP-US mutual defense pact'
There is nothing "mutual" about the 50-year-old RP-US Mutual Defense Treaty, militant umbrella group
Bagong Alyansang Makabayan (Bayan) said Saturday.
In a statement posted on its website, the group said the MDT instead is a continuing reminder of the Philippines' mendicancy and subservience to US interests.
"Over the past 50 years, the MDT has benefited the US primarily. It has allowed the US to make the Philippines
its neo-colonial outpost in Southeast Asia, having used the country during the US wars of aggression in Korea and Vietnam.
It made possible the existence then of US military bases and the existence now of the Visiting Forces Agreement (VFA) and
the Mutual Logistics Support Agreement," it said.
Bayan said that after 50 years of sitting on the Mutual Defense Board, the Philippine military has not
achieved modernization.
Even when there were US military bases, and after countless "joint exercises," the AFP has remained
a backward armed force in the region, it added.
"This is because the US never really intended the AFP to modernize fully and become a self-reliant armed
force. This is a basic condition for the US to continuously influence over the AFP and keep the latter dependent on US military
aid and surplus goods," it said.
Also, Bayan noted that while the MDT's mandate is that of warding off external threats to the Philippines,
it is also being used to justify American presence versus an internal threat such as the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF)
or even the Abu Sayyaf.
It added the extreme puppetry of the Arroyo regime is apparent when it allows the continuing and
permanent presence of American troops in Mindanao in the guise of "joint exercises" and "civic and humanitarian missions."
Yet, it said the Balikatan exercise in Mindanao has allowed the US Special Forces under the Joint Special
Operations Task Force-Philippines to be closer than ever to the armed conflict.
"The vague provisions of the VFA allow the US forces to maintain a rotational force of 400-600 soldiers
who stay for about six months and take part in so-called 'approved activities.' Through this loophole in the VFA, the US is
already operating a Forward Operating Site, a new type of flexible basing arrangement, in Zamboanga," it added.
Bayan said the so-called "civic operations" and "humanitarian missions" are merely part of the over-all
"communications strategy" of the US forces as pointed out in Annex A of the US Pacific Command Joint Training Strategy for
2007.
"The US is deploying US Special Forces - armed and trained fighters, not doctors and dentists - to Mindanao,"
it said.
It added the Visiting Forces Agreement does not set a limit on the number of US troops that can enter
the Philippines, the number of activities that can be approved in a year, and the type of activities that can take place.
Also, it said the US has acquired an expanded combat role when it engages in intelligence work and is
embedded in armed units of the AFP.
"Despite the apparent violations of the Philippine constitution by the US forces, the Philippine government
wants to have more 'joint exercises.' This means more intervention, violations of the Constitution, and the undermining of
our sovereignty," it said.
GMANews.TV 09/27/2008 | 07:49 AM
_________________________________________________________________________
US Troops Are Here to Stay, Concealed in Bases
Within AFP Camps
Since losing a number of its
major overseas bases in the 1990s, the US has had to make shifts in its basing strategy. It now increasingly relies on what
its Department of Defense calls “Cooperative Security Locations” (CSLs), and there is now less emphasis on “Main
Operating Bases” (MOBs). It has a number of CSLs in the Philippines, one of which is in Camp Navarro, Zamboanga City.
The US military installation
within Camp Navarro was mentioned by Pacifico Agabin, dean of the Lyceum of the Philippines School of Law, during his presentation
at the oral arguments against the RP-US Visiting Forces Agreement (VFA) before the Supreme Court on Sept. 19.
The 1987 Constitution does not
allow foreign military presence on Philippine soil except through a treaty jointly recognized by both contracting parties.
Art. XVIII, Sec. 25 of the Constitution provides that:
“After the expiration in
1991 of the Agreement between the Republic of the Philippines and the United States of America concerning military bases,
foreign military bases, troops, or facilities shall not be allowed in the Philippines except under a treaty duly concurred
in by the Senate and, when the Congress so requires, ratified by a majority of the votes cast by the people in a national
referendum held for that purpose, and recognized as a treaty by the other contracting State.”
The VFA was ratified in 1999
by the Philippine Senate and signed by then President Joseph Estrada, but it was never ratified by the US Senate.
The first RP-US Balikatan military
exercises under the VFA – which provides only for short stays by US troops – were conducted in 2002. There has
been continuous US military presence in the Philippines since then, manifested through the CSLs.
“Visiting is quite an understatement,
considering that the US forces have been with us for six years, and six years can hardly be considered a visit,” Agabin
said during the Sept. 19 oral arguments. “It is really a continuous visit. It is really a kind of visit that wears out
the hospitality of the host.”
Agabin then cited the presence
of CSLs within Philippine military camps – specifically the one located in Camp Navarro.
The website GlobalSecurity.org
defines the MOB and the CSL as follows:
A Main Operating Base (MOB) is
an enduring strategic asset established in friendly territory with permanently stationed combat forces, command and control
structures, and family support facilities. MOBs serve as the anchor points for throughput, training, engagement, and US commitment
to NATO. MOBs have: robust infrastructure; strategic access; established Command and Control; Forward Operating Sites and
Cooperative Security Location support capability; and enduring family support facilities. These are already in existence.
A Cooperative Security Location
(CSL) is a host-nation facility with little or no permanent US presence. CSLs will require periodic service, contractor and/or
host nation support. CSLs provide contingency access and are a focal point for security cooperation activities. They may contain
propositioned equipment. CSLs are: rapidly scalable and located for tactical use, expandable to become a FOS, forward and
expeditionary. They will have no family support system.
The US Department of Defense’s
Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms, meanwhile, defines a base as “a locality from which operations are projected
or supported,” reflecting clearly the role of these installations in war posturing.
In an article in the June 2005
issue of TheAtlantic.com, Robert D. Kaplan explains how CSLs work thus:
“A cooperative security
location can be a tucked-away corner of a host country’s civilian airport, or a dirt runway somewhere with fuel and
mechanical help nearby, or a military airport in a friendly country with which we have no formal basing agreement but, rather,
an informal arrangement with private contractors acting as go-betweens. Because the CSL concept is built on subtle relationships,
it’s where the war-fighting ability of the Pentagon and the diplomacy of the State Department coincide – or should.
The problem with big bases in, say, Turkey – as we learned on the eve of the invasion of Iraq – is that they are
an intrusive, intimidating symbol of American power, and the only power left to a host country is the power to deny us use
of such bases. In the future, therefore, we will want unobtrusive bases that benefit the host country much more obviously
than they benefit us. Allowing us the use of such a base would ramp up power for a country rather than humiliating it.
“I have visited a number
of CSLs in East Africa and Asia. Here is how they work. The United States provides aid to upgrade maintenance facilities,
thereby helping the host country to better project its own air and naval power in the region. At the same time, we hold periodic
exercises with the host country’s military, in which the base is a focus. We also offer humanitarian help to the surrounding
area. Such civil-affairs projects garner positive publicity for our military in the local media – and they long preceded
the response to the tsunami, which marked the first time that many in the world media paid attention to the humanitarian work
done all over the world, all the time, by the US military. The result is a positive diplomatic context for getting the host
country’s approval for use of the base when and if we need it.
“Often the key role in
managing a CSL is played by a private contractor. In Asia, for example, the private contractor is usually a retired American
noncom, either Navy or Air Force, quite likely a maintenance expert, who is living in, say, Thailand or the Philippines, speaks
the language fluently, perhaps has married locally after a divorce back home, and is generally much liked by the locals. He
rents his facilities at the base from the host-country military, and then charges a fee to the US Air Force pilots transiting
the base. Officially he is in business for himself, which the host country likes because it can then claim it is not really
working with the American military. Of course no one, including the local media, believes this. But the very fact that a relationship
with the US Armed Forces is indirect rather than direct eases tensions. The private contractor also prevents unfortunate incidents
by keeping the visiting pilots out of trouble—steering them to the right hotels and bars, and advising them on how to
behave. (Without Dan Generette, a private contractor for years at Utapao Naval Station, in Thailand, that base could never
have been ramped up to provide tsunami relief the way it was.)”
According to Roland Simbulan,
a professor of development studies at the University of the Philippines (UP) in Manila and an expert on RP-US foreign and
military relations, the dismantling of the US bases in the Philippines following the Senate’s rejection of a new Military
Bases Agreement in 1991 was a major contributor to the US shift in basing strategy.
The Philippines was once host
to the largest US overseas bases. Subic Naval Base alone had an area of 6,658 hectares, while Clark Air Base covered 4,400
hectares.
Apart from these, the US had
O’Donnell Transmitter Station (1,755 hectares), San Miguel Communications Station (1,100 hectares), Capas Naval Transmitter
Station (356 hectares), John Hay Air Station (227 hectares), and Wallance Air Station (202 hectares).
All these spanned a total area
of 14,698 hectares of arable land. “If you combine that, it would be bigger than Singapore,” Simbulan said in
an interview.
“So the dismantling of
the bases in the Philippines was a hard blow to the US. The US was really shocked by the 1991 vote against the new bases treaty…
They were forced to shift to a new basing strategy.
“CSLs were developed to
blunt political opposition to big military bases.”
The US maintains a number of
CSLs, mostly in Africa, Latin America, and Asia. US officials claim that the CSLs particularly in Africa and Latin America
exist for the purpose of combating the drug trade.
But this is just a cover, according
to Simbulan. “The US has not been consistent in its fight against the drug trade,” he said. He noted that the
US military, for instance, had colluded with drug syndicates in fighting revolutionary guerrillas and leaders in Colombia
and Cuba.
In the Philippines, there are
CSLs installed in Camp Aguinaldo, the General Headquarters of the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP); as well as in Camp
Navarro in Zamboanga City, in Cotabato City, and in Basilan.
Camp Navarro hosts the headquarters
of the Joint Special Operations Task Force-Philippines (JSOTF-P).
The JSOTF-P was established by
the US Special Operations Command Pacific (SOCPAC). It began its work when SOCPAC deployed to the Philippines Joint Task Force
(JTF) 510. Based on an item on GlobalSecurity.org, JTF 510 was deployed to the Philippines “to support Operation Enduring
Freedom.”
Operation Enduring Freedom is
the official name given to the US government’s military response to the terrorist attack of Sept. 11, 2001 in New York
City. It entails a series of anti-“terrorism” activities in Afghanistan, the Philippines, the Horn of Africa,
Trans-Sahara, and Pakinsi Gorge.
“CSLs are off-limits to
AFP personnel,” Simbulan disclosed. “I was able to talk with some AFP personnel at one time, and they told me
they don’t really know what the US troops are doing in their offices within AFP camps.”
“The (main) purpose for
these is for them to expand their operations so that when they have missions to Malaysia and Indonesia, they would have locations
that are open to them,” he said.
Saimbulan also said that the
CSLs in the Philippines are also used for “technical intelligence”, or surveillance, purposes. He said that the
US troops conducting surveillance operations are particularly active in strategic areas like Southwestern Mindanao.
“They go around in civilian
clothes,” he said. “Some of them disguise themselves as tourists.”
The immediate goal, he said,
is for the US troops to consolidate their influence in Mindanao. “It follows that when they consolidate their influence
there, US companies would have easier access to the area,” he said.
The long-term consideration,
however, is that the US views China as a long-term threat, Simbulan said.
Simbulan said that between 100
and 500 US troops are deployed all year in the Philippines, working from these CSLs. These, he said, are apart from those
who come to the Philippines periodically for the Balikatan military exercises.
Executive Secretary Eduardo Ermita
recently said that US troops come and go but they “all look alike,” so it is as though they never leave.
“They are replaced every
now and then,” Ermita said. “They leave, contrary to the critics’ impression that they have not left.”
But this is not so, said Simbulan.
“It is those who join the Balikatan who come and go, but those (in the CSLs) are deployed here for prolonged periods,”
he said.
He recounted his conversation
with the wife of a US official on one trip to Zamboanga, during which he learned that in the Camp Navarro CSL there is now
a building for housing.
There is no treaty between the
Philippines and the US which allows for the presence of CSLs on Philippine soil.
BY ALEXANDER MARTIN REMOLLINO Bulatlat
PUBLISHED ON September 21, 2008 AT 12:32 AM
________________________________________________________________________________________
As world stock market plunges,GSIS, SSS
Funds in Danger - Courage
A group of government employees said that the funds of Government Service Insurance System (GSIS) and Social Security
System (SSS) are in ‘grave danger.’
The Confederation for Unity, Recognition and Advancement of Government Employees (Courage) said that the money invested
by the GSIS and SSS in the local stock markets will be affected by the falling world stock markets due the declaration
of bankruptcy by the Lehman Brothers, one of the America’s top banking groups.
Courage National President Ferdinand Gaite said that they have warned the social security institutions about the danger
of putting the members’ money in volatile investments the like of shares of stocks.
World financial analysts and stock brokers fear that the Lehman Brothers’ declaration is just one of the series
of ‘bad news’ for the financial sector and the current US financial turmoil will worsen in the coming days.
“Like Manila Electric Co. shares, which dropped excessively—from the original price of P80.90 (US$1.71,
based on the prevailing exchange rate) to P57 ($1.21) per share—same thing will happen to other investments made by
the GSIS and SSS to the stock market,” explained Gaite.
Aside from the Meralco shares, GSIS also suffered losses in buying stocks with the former Equitable-PCI Bank, Bell
Resources, Empire East, and even with San Miguel Corporation, he added.
The group said they will file formal charges against the GSIS management, particularly against GSIS President and
General Manager Atty. Winston F. Garcia, for mismanagement of funds and violations of the Republic Act No. 8291 or the GSIS
law. Bulatlat
BY NOEL SALES BARCELONA Contributed to Bulatlat September 17, 2008
________________________________________________________________________________________
66
dead, 79 hurt in Mindanao fighting--NDCC
MANILA,
Philippines -- At least 66 people have died from the ongoing conflict in Mindanao, the National Disaster Coordinating Council
(NDCC) said.
In its
latest report, the NDCC said four soldiers were killed in the fighting with the rest tallied as civilian casualties.
The report
also said 79 people have been injured in the conflict, 66 civilians and 13 law enforcers.
The NDCC
added that the number of affected families who have either lost their houses, displaced or have lost their livelihood have
shot up from 88,243 families to 100,024 families or 479,223 persons.
The number
of evacuees sheltering in evacuation centers has also shot up from 18,080 families (89,024 persons) to 22,861 families (111,133
persons), the NDCC added.
The NDCC
also denied reports of a "food blockade" after a United Nations convoy of relief goods were barred to enter Poona Piagapo,
Tangkal and Munai in Delabayan, Kauswagan on August 28.
The Armed
Forces of the Philippines clarified that the convoy was not allowed to enter for "security reasons" and was allowed to proceed
the following day with the help of the local government and Peace Advocates from Iligan City.
The NDCC
also advised humanitarian aid workers to coordinate with the regional office of civil defense.
Continuous
assistance to displaced civilians is being undertaken through government cluster leads, disaster coordinating councils and
concerned local government units, the NDCC added in its report.
Total assistance
being provided by the NDCC and partner organizations like local and international non-government organizations have reached
P51.77 million.
The USAID
has also provided an additional $100,000 to Save the Children under the Mindanao Emergency Response Network.
Health
surveillance systems have been intensified and vaccination in evacuation centers have been conducted following a surge in
reported cases of measles and mumps.
Medical
consultations in Munai and Matungao are being conducted by local health personnel, the NDCC added.
Meanwhile,
the Department of Social Welfare and Development has indicated that they were ready to assist displaced evacuees living with
their relatives and friends so long as a signed master list would be provided by local chief executives.
The DSWD
in the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao has also suggested that "bunk houses" be constructed as temporary shelter for
displaced families and that the Department of Public Works and Highways help in the construction of these buildings.
The Office
of Civil Defense in Region 10 also recommended that displaced families in the municipalities of Poona Piagapo, Tangkal and
Munai be evacuated to Delabayan, Kauswagan and other coastal areas "where they can be served better."
But evacuees
refused the offer for security reasons and for fear of "possible reprisal" from Christians, the NDCC added.
The OCD
Region 10 has also expressed urgency to "decongest" the evacuations centers in Lanao del Norte since an increase in acute
respiratory infections has been reported.
The NDCC
added that the Armed Forces of the Philippines should also help in ensuring the safe entry of workers from the Department
of Health and other health sectors to provide treatment and implement other disease control mechanisms.
There is
also a need for rice and medicine augmentation in evacuation centers and assistance to refugees in terms of livelihood, crops
and livestock rehabilitation, the NDCC added.
The DepEd
has also raised concern on the effects to students of the indefinite suspension of classes due to the damages to school buildings
and the use of some buildings as evacuation centers.
Classes
are still suspended in schools in Kauswagan and Lanao del Norte provinces and also in Barangay (villages) Tingin-tingin, Baraason,
Dilabayan, Kayontor and Paiton.
The DepEd
is still assessing and validating damages in other provinces.
First posted 17:58:16 (Mla time) September 03, 2008 Alcuin Papa Katherine Evangelista Philippine Daily Inquirer
___________________________________________________________________________________________
Debt Payments
48% of Proposed 2009 Budget; Allotment for Services Measly
In her message titled Standing Firm in
the Midst of Economic Challenges, Mrs. Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo said, “A number one priority of my Administration is
services to uplift the lives of the poor. No other priority encapsulates so succinctly the commitments I have made since I
assumed the Presidency.”
The message is addressed to members of
the House of Representatives. Congress has started its deliberations Sept. 3 on the proposed P1.415-trillion ($30.22 billion
at the Sept. 5 exchange rate of $1:P46.82) national budget for next year.
At first glance, the proposed budget
shows increased allocations for education, health and other social services. A closer examination, however, would prove that
these allotments are measly compared to debt payments.
In the same message, Arroyo said, “Debt
service’s 21.4-percent share in the national budget next year shows a conspicuous continuous decline from 31.6 percent
in 2005 and 23.2 percent in 2007, in accordance with our deficit reduction strategy. This means more resources can now be
used for essential spending on investments on our human and capital resources.”
Arroyo was only referring to the interest
payments pegged at P302.6 billion ($6.46 billion). If principal amortization would be computed, total debt service for next
year is P681.5 billion ($1.46 billion) or 48.16 percent of the proposed national budget.
|
Proposed Allocation |
Proposed Budget
(in billions) |
Per Capita |
|
Debt Service
Interest Payment
Principal Amortization |
681.5
302.6
378.0 |
P7,391.54 |
|
Education
DepEd
SUCs |
189.1
167.9
22.6 |
2,050.98 |
|
Health |
27.8 |
301.52 |
|
Housing |
5.3 |
57.48 |
|
Social Welfare |
10.4 |
112.80 |
|
Agriculture and Agrarian Reform
DAR
DA |
14.3
10.7
3.6 |
155.1 |
|
Defense |
56.4 |
611.71 |
Source: National Expenditure
Program for 2009 Per capita is computed based on the projected population for 2009, 92.2 million
Presidential Decree No. 1177, issued
by the late President Ferdinand Marcos during martial law, allows automatic appropriation for debt service and other expenditure
items. Allocation for the principal amortization of national government debt is not included in the proposed national budget.
Health
Based on the proposed budget, the Department
of Health (DoH) will get P27.8 billion ($593.76 million). The proposal is 36.9 percent higher than this year’s allocation.
However, the amount is still measly.
With the projected 92.2-million population next year, government health spending would only be P0.83 ($0.02) per person per
day.
For next year, the proposed allocation
for disease prevention and control is only P4.51 billion ($96.33 million) while P161.73 million ($3.45 million) is allotted
for monitoring and surveillance of diseases and outbreaks.
Subsidies for indigent patients for confinement
in specialty hospitals and for the use of specialized equipment is only P6 million ($128,150.36).
The 12 specialty government hospitals
have a combined budget of only P3.23 billion ($68.99 million). These include the Jose Reyes Memorial Medical Center, Rizal
Medical Center, East Avenue Medical Center, Quirino Memorial Medical Center, Tondo Medical Center, Jose Fabella Memorial Hospital,
National Children's Hospital, National Center for Mental Health, Philippine Orthopedic Center, San Lazaro Hospital, Research
Institute for Tropical Medicine (RITM), and Eulogio “Amang” Rodriguez Medical Center.
The RITM will receive no fund for capital
outlay.
The Eulogio “Amang” Rodriguez
Medical Center will get the lowest budget of P103.85 million ($2.21 million). The National Center for Mental Health will be
allotted P517.94 million ($11.06 million).
The budget for the Philippine General
Hospital (PGH) for this year is P1.14 billion ($24.35 million), of which P878.56 million ($18.76 million) is allotted for
personnel services and only P3 million ($64,075.18) for capital outlay.
Meanwhile, the Veterans Memorial Medical
Center will receive P 742.40 million ($15.86 million) and the AFP Medical Center, P850.09 million ($18,156557).
In fact, the proposed health budget is
lesser by P6.62 billion ($141.39 million) than the government’s counter-insurgency funds for next year, which amounts
to P34.42 billion ($735.16 million).
Moreover, the health budget is less than
half of the proposed budget for the Department of National Defense pegged at P56.4 billion ($1.2 billion).
The Arroyo government will also allocate
some P3.3 billion ($70.48 million) next year for the National Health Insurance Program. The amount will be used to provide
health insurance to 4.7 million indigent households.
The NHIP is the main instrument of the
Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (PhilHealth).
Arroyo said there are 65 million Filipinos
who have health insurance, including 15 million indigents. However, in a study, the National Institute of Health maintained
that the PhilHealth’s claim of coverage is overestimated by at least 20 percent.
The Health Alliance for Democracy (HEAD)
noted that the PhilHealth coverage bloated to 80 percent during the election period in 2007. In the past years, the coverage
was only 61 percent.
Another study commissioned by the European
Commission regarding PhilHealth coverage in Mindanao showed that only ten percent of the poor in Tawi-Tawi, 12 percent in
Davao Oriental and 15 percent in Zamboanga del Norte and Maguindanao are covered by PhilHealth.
Education
The Department of Education (DepEd) will
receive P167.9 billion ($3.59 billion) including P2 billion ($42.72 million) for construction of classrooms.
With the P2 billion budget, only 3,076
classrooms can be built. Arroyo said that each classroom costs P650,000 ($13,882.96).
In a statement, the Alliance of Concerned
Teachers (ACT) estimated that the DepEd needs to construct an additional 41,905 classrooms in order to attain a 1:45 classroom-to-
student ratio.
Antonio Tinio, ACT chaiperson noted that
at the elementary level, classroom shortages are concentrated in the National Capital Region (NCR) and Calabarzon (Cavite,
Laguna, Batangas, Rizal, Quezon). At the secondary level, there are classroom shortages nationwide, but are most acutely felt
in NCR, Calabarzon, Central Luzon, and Central and Western Visayas, he added.
The proposed budget will include P2.5
billion ($53.4 million) to fund the creation of 19,553 new teaching and non-teaching personnel.
ACT’s Tinio said, “To reduce
class sizes to 40 students per class at the elementary level and 45 students per class at the secondary level, DepEd needs
to hire 25,240 additional teachers.”
Tinio also criticized the ‘problematic’
computation of DepEd on the teacher-student ratios. "Teacher-pupil ratios don't take factors such as class size, teacher specialization
from Grade 4 onwards, and teaching load into consideration. This leads to an absurd situation where the DepEd claims that
there is now a surplus of teachers just because the teacher-pupil ratio stands at 1:35 for elementary and 1:39 for high schools,"
he said.
The budget for 112 state universities
and colleges (SUCs) is only P22.57 billion ($482.06 million).
The University of the Philippines (UP)
system will get P6.7 billion ($143.1 million), the biggest budget among SUCs. The UP has a population of more than 50,000.
It is comprised of seven constituent universities located in 12 campuses throughout the country.
The Polytechnic University of the Philippines
(PUP), the largest university in terms of student population will only receive P663.64 million ($14.17 million). It has six
campuses, two branches and ten extension campuses serving more than 52,000 students.
The Philippine Normal University (PNU),
the country’s center for teacher education, will only get P282.32 million ($6.03 million). It has four campuses in the
country.
Housing, social
welfare
A meager P5.3 billion ($113.2 million)
will be allotted for housing.
The P300 million will be allotted for
the operational requirements of regulatory agencies such as the Housing and Urban Development Coordinating Council (HUDCC)
and the Housing and Land Use Regulatory Board (HLURB).
The National Housing Authority (NHA)
will get P3.5 billion ($74.75 million). Arroyo said it will be used to set up resettlement sites and build new housing units.
Meanwhile, even as the DSWD budget will
increase by 116 percent, the bulk will go to donations and subsidies. These include Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino program, P5
billion ($106.79 million); and, Malusog na Simula, Yaman ng Bansa feeding program, P1.58 billion ($33.75 million).
The Pantawid Pamilya program, Arroyo
said, will provide cash grants to 321,000 poorest households.
Big chunks
The Arroyo government will invest P147.5
billion ($3.15 billion) for infrastructure. Of this amount, P83.9 billion will be used to build and maintain roads and bridges.
The Department of Public Works and Highways
(DPWH) will receive P120 billion ($2.56 billion).
Critics, however, fear that the funds
for infrastructure would be vulnerable to corruption. In many surveys, the DPWH is consistently perceived to be one of the
most corrupt government agencies in the country.
Another controversial item in the proposed
2009 national budget is the allocation for confidential and intelligence expenses of different government offices amounting
to P1.36 billion ($29.05 million).
The Office of the President will get
the biggest intelligence fund worth P650 million ($13.88 million). The Department of Interior and Local Government (DILG)
will get P270 million ($5.77 million) for the same purpose while the DND will receive P151.64 million ($3.24 million). These
funds are not subject to government audit. Bulatlat
BY RONALYN V. OLEA Bulatlat Volume
VIII, No. 31, September 7-13, 2008
______________________________________________________________________________________
As
GRP, MILF Clash over Aborted Agreement, Peace Deals with MNLF Remain Unimplemented
While the conflict between
the Government of the Republic of the Philippines (GRP) and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front has re-escalated in the wake
of the aborted signing of the Memorandum of Agreement on Ancestral Domain (MOA-AD), between the two groups, there are previous
peace agreements dealing with the Moro people’s struggle for self-determination that have yet to be properly implemented.
The Moro National Liberation
Front (MNLF), which began to wage armed struggle against the GRP following the infamous Jabidah Massacre of 1967, signed in
1976 the Tripoli Agreement with the Marcos government after the latter, weighed down by the costs of the Mindanao war, negotiated
for peace. The peace negotiations and the signing of the agreement were sponsored and hosted by the Organization of Islamic
Conference (OIC).
The pact involved the grant
of autonomy to Muslims. Under the said agreement, areas of autonomy for Muslims were to be established in the following areas:
Basilan, Sulu, Tawi-Tawi, Zamboanga del Sur, Zamboanga del Norte, North Cotabato, Maguindanao, Sultan Kudarat, Lanao del Norte,
Lanao del Sur, Davao del Sur, South Cotabato, and Palawan.
Conflicts on the issue
of autonomy led to a breakdown of talks between the GRP and the MNLF in 1978, prompting a group led by Salamat Hashim to break
away from the MNLF and form the MILF. Since then, the MILF has been fighting for Moro self-determination.
In 1989, the Autonomous
Region in Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) was created through Republic Act No. 6734. The ARMM originally comprised the provinces of
Sulu, Tawi-Tawi, Maguindanao, and Lanao del Sur.
In 1996, the MNLF signed
the Final Peace Agreement with the GRP. That same year, the MILF began peace negotiations with the GRP.
The 1996 Final Peace Agreement,
which is an implementing mechanism for the Tripoli Agreement, provides among other things for amendments to or the repeal
of RA 6734. It was specifically provided that amendments to or the repeal of RA 6734 would be initiated within the period
1996-1997, after which the amendatory law would be submitted to a plebiscite or referendum in the original ARMM provinces
as well as in the provinces of Zamboanga del Sur, Zamboanga del Norte, North Cotabato, Sultan Kudarat, Lanao del Norte, Lanao
del Sur, Davao del Sur, South Cotabato, Sarangani and Palawan and the cities of Cotabato, Dapitan, Dipolog, General Santos,
lligan, Marawi, Pagadian, Zamboanga and Puerto Princesa.
The 1996 Final Peace Agreement
created the Southern Philippines Council for Peace and Development, with the ARMM under the MNLF, as a transitional implementing
mechanism. It also placed the “areas of autonomy” provided for by the Tripoli Agreement within the coverage of
a Special Zone for Peace and Development (SZOPAD). The SPCPD and the ARMM under the MNLF were to encourage the provinces within
the SZOPAD to join what would be an expanded ARMM.
The agreed-upon amendments
to RA 6734, which were expected to be initiated within the 1996-1997 period as provided for by the 1996 Final Peace Agreement,
did not materialize. Instead, Congress, a few years later, passed RA 9054, which sought to expand the coverage of the ARMM
– without consultations with the MNLF and the OIC. Under the said law, areas to be covered by the expanded ARMM were
to be subjected to a plebiscite.
In the plebiscite held
in August 2001 – after RA 9054 lapsed into law without Mrs. Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo’s signature – only Marawi
City and Basilan (except Isabela City) elected to be part of the expanded ARMM.
On Nov. 19, 2001, MNLF
chairman and then ARMM Gov. Nur Misuari declared war on the Arroyo government for allegedly reneging on its commitments to
the 1996 Final Peace Agreement. The MNLF then attacked an Army headquarters in Jolo.
Misuari was subsequently
arrested in Sabah, Malaysia for illegal entry and was turned over to the Philippine government by Malaysian authorities. He
is currently under house arrest in New Manila, Quezon City.
“Fait accompli
solution”
In an interview, Misuari,
citing a comment by an OIC representative whom he did not identify, said the non-implementation of the GRP-MNLF agreements
means that the government is merely interested in a “fait accompli solution” to the conflict in Mindanao. “A
fait accompli solution could only mean one thing: the pursuit of peace through military means,” he said.
The MNLF leader said, however,
that it is now impossible for the government to win against the MNLF by military means. He said the MNLF now has a total strength
of 150,000-200,000 and is in possession of various high-powered weapons including, he said, anti-tank weapons. “If the
government thinks they can win against us, they should go to Mandaluyong,” he said, referring to the Metro Manila city
where the National Center for Mental Health (NCMH) is located.
“The MNLF has not
yet unleashed its military potential because we don’t want to be at odds with the OIC and its member-states –
57 member-states, all sovereign states, members of the United Nations in good standing – you know, we cannot annoy them,
we cannot defy their demands that we maintain the peace,” he also said. “And we continue to uphold the achievement
that we made across the negotiating table.”
Adding insult to injury,
Misuari said, is the government’s attempt to impose its Memorandum of Agreement on Ancestral Domain (MOA-AD) with the
MILF on the GRP-MNLF peace agreements.
The MOA-AD seeks the establishment
of a BJE that would also cover the Mindanao-Sulu-Palawan region – with the ARMM as the core of the new region. As regards
governance, the agreement provides among other things that:
“The relationship
between the Central Government and the BJE shall be associative characterized by shared authority and responsibility with
a structure of governance based on executive, legislative, judicial and administrative institutions with defined powers and
functions in the Comprehensive Compact. A period of transition shall be established in a Comprehensive Compact specifying
the relationship between the Central Government and the BJE.”
The MNLF leader said that
trying to impose the MOA-AD on their peace agreements with the GRP is an insult to his group.
“It is not good (for
the Philippine government) to treat us the way they do,” Misuari said. “We have signed a formal peace agreement
and now they are trying to sign a MOA which they want to impose or superimpose on our binding international agreement. This
is tantamount to slapping the face...of the MNLF.”
He said that before signing
the MOA-AD, the GRP would have done well to send a written communication to the MNLF and the OIC stating that it no longer
feels bound by the 1996 Final Peace Agreement. “We would not have been hurt by that,” Misuari said.
The MOA-AD was to be signed
by the GRP and the MILF last Aug. 5, but the Supreme Court on Aug. 4 issued a temporary restraining order on its signing following
a petition by North Cotabato Vice Gov. Emmanuel Piñol, supported by another petition filed by Zamboanga City Mayor Celso Lobregat
and two congressmen. The Supreme Court has since been hearing oral arguments on the MOA-AD.
Origins
of the conflict
Moro historian Salah Jubair
traces the roots of the present conflict in southern Philippines to the US annexation of Mindanao and Sulu into the Philippine
territory in 1946. Jubair argues that the Bangsamoro is a people with a socio-political, economic, and cultural system distinct
from that of the Filipino people.
The inclusion of Mindanao
and Sulu in the scope of the 1946 “independence” granted to the Philippines paved the way for large-scale non-Muslim
migration to the two islands. This large-scale migration, which began in the 1950s, brought with it the problem of land grabbing.
At some point the government
even instituted a Mindanao Homestead Program, which involved giving land parcels seized from Moros to landless peasants from
the Visayas islands and Luzon and also to former communist guerrillas who availed of amnesty. This was intended to defuse
the peasant unrest and the revolutionary war that was staged in the late 1940s and early 1950s by the communist-led Hukbong
Mapagpalaya ng Bayan (HMB or People’s Liberation Army), which was basically a peasant army.
The Jabidah Massacre of
1967 triggered widespread outrage among the Moros and led to the formation of the MNLF that same year. A breakdown in the
GRP-MNLF peace talks in 1978 led a group led by Salamat Hashim to break away and form the MILF.
As the armed conflict between
the GRP and the MILF rages in Mindanao because of an aborted agreement, another bigger conflict threatens to unfold, this
time with the MNLF, because the government failed to implement a previous agreement. Bulatlat
BY ALEXANDER MARTIN REMOLLINO Bulatlat Vol.
VIII, No. 29, August 24-30, 2008
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Sen Arroyo slams ‘overstaying’ US military in Mindanao
MANILA,
Philippines -- Senator Joker Arroyo on Wednesday criticized what he described as “overstaying” American troops
in Mindanao.
"The
US-Philippines Visiting Forces Agreement…has been dubbed as the Overstaying Forces Agreement because of the continuous
stay of US forces in the ARMM [Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao] border provinces," he said.
Arroyo
also criticized what he called President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo's “injudicious” plan to seek the help of the
United Kingdom and Sweden in forging a peace settlement with the Moro Islamic Liberation Front.
"First
the Americans, then the British? The President would be better off avoiding Western participation [in] indigenously Asiatic
affairs," he said.
Earlier,
the senator criticized the presence of US Ambassador to the Philippines Kristie Kenney in Kuala Lumpur for the scheduled signing
of the memorandum of agreement on ancestral domain between the government and MILF.
The
signing was called off after the Supreme Court issued a temporary restraining order on petitions by officials of North Cotabato
and Zamboanga City to declare the agreement unconstitutional.
The
aborted signing of the agreement was followed almost immediately after by fighting between government and MILF forces, which
is still ongoing in Central Mindanao.
"It
[seeking British and Swedish aid] is misguided, a frying pan to the fire approach. Whoever gave the President that bum steer
should be canned," Arroyo said.
Citing
the National Statistics Office, which places Muslims at only five percent of the country's population, Arroyo said the problem
in Mindanao is a geographical dispute between Muslims and Christians.
First
posted 13:31:14 (Mla time) August 27, 2008 Veronica Uy INQUIRER.net ________________________________________________________________________
Padaca asks Filipinos: Replicate democratic victories
MANILA,
Philippines -- Breakthroughs and victories against "oppressive political structures" need to be encouraged and supported to
be replicated, said Isabela governor and Ramon Magsaysay awardee for government service Grace Magno Padaca on Sunday.
In
accepting her award at the Cultural Center of the Philippines, Padaca also said political victories were "fragile" and asked
for continued support.
"Victories
are fragile and they need to be supported and encouraged," she said. "Please continue encouraging and supporting me."
The
Ramon Magsaysay Awards, recognized as Asia's Nobel Peace Prize, celebrated its 50th anniversary today with Padaca as one of
the recipients.
Padaca
broke the Dy family's grip on Isabela in the 2004 gubernatorial elections by raking in 55 percent of the votes, making headlines
for toppling a political dynasty that spanned 30 years. Now on her second term as governor, she rose to fame for her campaign
for democratic elections. Padaca also said that the "political victory" she achieved in her province must be replicated nationally.
"What
we dared to do is to make democracy work especially in electing our leaders," she said. "In less than two years, we will be
electing our leaders and are going to the polls. We need to continue succeeding after raining hopes on our people."
Meanwhile,
Jaime Zobel de Ayala, chairman of the board of trustees of the Ramon Magsaysay Foundation, expressed hope that the Ramon Magsaysay
Awards would be "Asia's solution to global problems."
Ayala
also said that the future would not only connect countries and people but also problems.
"As
we embark in the next 50 years, these global problems will remain unresolved without greatness of service," he added. "The
world will continue to become more connected and we will become more connected with each other. Wealth and prosperity will
no longer have boundaries. In the next decade, we will be forced to face the demands of growth and development."
He
said these "demands" include lack of access to resources, basic rights and accountability, among others.
Other
winners of this year's Ramon Magsaysay Awards are Thailand's Therdchai Jivacate and the Philippines' Center for Agriculture
and Rural Development Mutually Reinforcing Institutions (CAD MRI) for public service; India's Prakash Amte and Mandakini Amte
for community leadership; Japan's Akio Ishii for journalism, literature and creative communication arts; Indonesia's Ahmad
Syafii Maarif for peace and international understanding; and Sri Lanka's Ananda Galappatti for emergent leadership.
First
posted 17:54:00 (Mla time) August 31, 2008 Abigail Kwok INQUIRER.net _________________________________________________________________________
Cheaper medicines law not the solution--health groups
MANILA,
Philippines -- The recently enacted cheaper medicines is “not the solution” to the problem of expensive medicines,
around a hundred members of health workers’ groups who picketed the Department of Health (DoH) office in Manila on Thursday
said.
Government’s
claims that Republic Act 9502 or the "Universally Accessible Cheaper and Quality Medicines Act of 2008” will make medicines
affordable are giving consumers “false hopes,” Dr. Gene Nesperos, secretary general of the Health Alliance for
Democracy (Head), said in an interview.
Joining
Head in at the hour-long DoH picket to express “disappointment” with the measure were the Alliance of Health Workers,
Council for Health and Development, and Kilos Bayan para sa Kalusugan (People’s Movement for Health).
“It
might affect the price (of medicines) but whether it will make medicines affordable is an entirely different issue…
possible na mas mura, pero hindi ibig sabihin ay kaya nang bilhin ng mga mahihirap [prices may be cheaper but it does not
mean that the poor can afford them],” Nesperos said.
He
called the measure a “weak law” that fails to address the “highly monopolized” prices of medicine,
Nesperos said.
The
intellectual property code provisions of the measure also allegedly favor importers and producers of medicines in the Philippines,
Nesperos said.
The
protesting health groups called for “concrete and more decisive actions” by of the government to explore possible
solutions, not provided in the cheaper medicines law, to lower the prices of medicines and drugs.
The
DoH is still formulating the implementing rules and regulations of the new law, Nesperos said, as he urged the agency not
to be limited by the provisions of the law.
The
protesters suggested that government regulate and nationalize the medicine industry in order “to dismantle monopoly”
and ensure that drugs and medicines will be “affordable and accessible” to the masses.
“If the government is sincere
in making medicines affordable and accessible, they should regulate the medicine industry,” Nesperos said.
First
posted 14:49:16 (Mla time) August 28, 2008 Katherine Evangelista INQUIRER.net _______________________________________________________________________________________
Thousands turn out for 12-hour ‘Truth
Fest’
Traffic
snarled on northbound lane of Roxas Blvd
MANILA, Philippines -- Thousands of people have turned out for a 12-hour “Truth Fest” at the Rajah Sulaiman
Plaza on Roxas Boulevard in Manila from 5 p.m. Friday to 5 a.m. Saturday.
The participants, from militant labor, youth, church and other sectoral and civil society groups, carried banners
and were escorted by marching bands as they converged on the site of the activity, where they were greeted by “gigantes,”
giant figures traditionally used during the fiesta in Antipolo City.
The overnight activity comes a day after the 25th death anniversary of former senator Benigno “Ninoy”
Aquino Jr., whose murder in 1983 helped spawn the mass protest movement that would eventually oust the dictator Ferdinand
Marcos in 1986 and replace him with Aquino’s widow, Corazon, the country’s first woman president.
Members of the artists’ coalition Tutok have painted the road with various derogatory images of President Gloria
Macapagal-Arroyo against a backdrop of the American flag with bullets instead of stars.
Tutok coordinator Iggy Rodriguez said the backdrop symbolized US intervention in Philippine affairs, including the
continuing conflict in Mindanao.
The images of Arroyo, on the other hand, are related to various issues raised against her.
Among these are of Arroyo dancing the cha-cha, a reference to Charter change, which is often shortened into the popular
ballroom dance, and of a crucified Filipino with the President as Pontius Pilate.
As with traditional fiestas, the streets are lined with stalls selling food and various merchandise including books.
Traffic is snarled on the northbound lane of Roxas Boulevard, which has been closed from Quirino Avenue to Pedro Gil.
Among the personalities spotted at the protest are Bagong Alyansang Makabayan secretary general Renato Reyes, former
social welfare secretary Corazon Soliman and Dante Madriaga.
The Truth Fest will feature a concert, art exhibits, films and a performance of the Philippine Dragonboat Team.
The activity will seek to set a new world record for a “voice choir” that will recite a “litany
of untruths” allegedly committed by the Arroyo administration, Reyes said, including the “Hello Garci” scandal
involving purported wiretaps of the President and a former election official allegedly discussing how to rig the 2004 elections
in her favor, and the scandal-tainted national broadband network (NBN) deal, to which Arroyo and her husband Jose Miguel have
been implicated.
“It will be a venue for creative and innovative ways to encourage truth-telling and to search for truth,”
said Sister Mary John Mananzan, OSB, of Association of Major Religious Superiors in the Philippines (AMRSP).
Mananzan also stressed that the event would not be a venue for politicians to campaign for the 2010 elections.
“Pwede silang magsalita, pero hindi sila pwedeng mangampanya [They can talk but they can’t campaign],”
she added.
Independent film makers are expected to make a documentary film on the “Truth Fest,” featuring different
perspectives of the event.
Hundreds of students belonging to the League of Filipino Students (LFS), Youth Act Now, and Anakbayan walked out of
their classes at the University of the Philippines in Diliman, Polytechnic University of the Philippines, Adamson University,
and Philippine Christian University Friday morning to kick off the Truth Fest.
“Arroyo's game plan and scenario-building are becoming more obvious by the minute. First, Charter change, then
Arroyo and her militarist-thinking advisers are now manipulating the Mindanao conflict to sow an atmosphere of panic and chaos
even in Manila and other regions,” said LFS chairman Vencer Crisostomo.
"Instead
of self-serving schemes, Arroyo should address the present economic crisis burdening the people. Last we checked oil prices
are still at record-high levels, the lines at NFA retail shops are not getting any shorter and the government is earning more
windfalls via the VAT at the expense of our poor countrymen,” said Ken Ramos, Anakbayan national chair.
By Abigail Kwok INQUIRER.net First Posted 13:30:00
08/22/2008
________________________________________________________________________
On Ninoy’s
25th Death Anniversary,
Shadows of Marcos
Seen in Gloria
On the
25th anniversary of the assassination of Senator Benigno “Ninoy” Aquino Jr., the Bagong Alyansang Makabayan (Bayan
- New Patriotic Alliance) said they see the ‘looming shadows of the Marcos dictatorship in the Macapagal-Arroyo administration.’
The
group said that August 21 is ‘a landmark date in the fight against corruption, abuse of power and gross human rights
violations.’ They held a protest in front of the late senator’s monument in Makati, Thursday afternoon.
Aquino,
a leading critic of the Marcos dictatorship was was assassinated at the tarmac of the Manila International Airport on Aug.
21, 1983.
In a
statement, Renato Reyes Jr., Bayan secretary general said, “We see a president that refuses to learn from the lessons
of history; one who is intent on repeating the mistakes of the past… Arroyo also wishes to perpetuate herself in power
either through charter change or some Marcosian tactic of martial rule.”
Protesters
held pictures of Mrs. Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo and Ferdinand Marcos.
Reyes
said, “Ninoy’s death anniversary is a reminder of the price that was paid by those before us who fought the US-backed
Marcos dictatorship…Under the US-backed Arroyo regime, many Filipinos continue to die fighting for the same causes of
human rights, sovereignty and democracy.” Bayan also condemned Arroyo’s all-out war in Mindanao,
saying that it would ultimately fail if fundamental social problems are not addressed. Bulatlat
BY MEDZ MONTEREAL Contributed
to Bulatlat Posted August 21, 2008 - 4:10 p.m.
_________________________________________________________________________
The
MoA, the Cha Cha, and the U.S. Ambassador
So much controversy
has surrounded the signing of the Memorandum of Agreement on ancestral domain between the Arroyo government and the Moro Islamic
Liberation Front (MILF). In stead of engendering peace, it has led to the escalation of the conflict; in stead of bringing
about unity and the community of peoples, it has led to tensions between the MILF and the affected communities of North Cotabato,
no less aided by the word war between Vice Gov. Emmanuel “Manny” Piñol and ‘peace’
adviser Hermogenes Esperon. Events became clearer when suddenly the Arroyo
government began pushing for charter change purportedly to achieve peace in Mindanao; and US ambassador Kristie Kenney showed
up in the aborted signing of the MoA in Malaysia.
The
controversy came to a head with the declaration of the Arroyo government that it’s “all systems go” for
charter change, purportedly to initiate the shift to federalism to accommodate the demands of the MILF for autonomy.
This stirred the hornet’s nest.
Meanwhile,
Sen. Joker Arroyo raised questions regarding the presence of US Ambassador Kristie Kenney in the aborted signing of the Memorandum
of Agreement with the MILF in Malaysia. Quick to the defense was Justice Sec. Raul Gonzalez who castigated people for
questioning the presence of Ambassador Kenney, which to him was normal.
Clearly,
there are three interested parties in the ongoing negotiations between the government and the MILF.
First
is the MILF and the Bangsamoro people.
The
struggle of the Bangsamoro people for their right to self-determination dates back to the American colonial period.
It was revived with the Jabidah massacre and the formation of the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF) in 1968. The armed
conflict between the Armed Forces of the Philippines and the MNLF erupted upon the declaration of Martial Law. The Organization
of Islamic Conference intervened and pushed for peace talks between the Government of the Republic of the Philippines (GRP)
and the MNLF.
Talks
between the GRP and the MNLF gained some ground with the 1976 Tripoli Agreement, which declared the ”establishment of
Autonomy in the Southern Philippines within the realm of the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Republic of the
Philippines.” The “areas of autonomy for the Muslims in the Southern Philippines”, as provided for
by the Tripoli agreement are Basilan, Sulu, Tawi Tawi, Zamboanga del Sur, Zamboanga del Norte, North Cotabato, Maguindanao,
Sultan Kudarat, Lanao del Norte, Lanao del Sur, Davao del Sur, South Cotabato, Palawan, and “all the cities and villages
situated in the above-mentioned areas.” The autonomous government would have had a Legislative Assembly and an Executive
Council. Courts implementing the Islamic Shari’a laws would have been set-up. And they should have
had their own economic and financial system. In addition, a “reasonable percentage” derived from revenues
from mines and mineral resources should have been allotted “for the benefit of the areas of autonomy.”
But
it was only in 1996 when the Final Peace Agreement was signed. According to the agreement, Phase 1, lasting three years,
began with the issuance of the Executive Order establishing the Special Zone of Peace and Development and the Southern Philippine
Council for Peace and Development. Phase II should have involved the amendment or repeal of the Organic Act of the Autonomous
Region in Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) or RA 6734. In a plebiscite in November 2001 only Marawi city and Basilan (except Isabela
city) elected to be part of the ARMM.
It took
20 years from the signing of the Tripoli agreement before a Final Peace Agreement was sealed. And after more than ten
years after the Final Peace Agreement was forged, seemingly the implementation has barely gone beyond Phase 1. The implementation
or non-implementation of the Final Peace Agreement has been a constant source of tension between the GRP and the MNLF and
has led to sporadic fighting between AFP and MNLF forces.
Without
settling the problems in the implementation of the Final Peace Agreement with the MNLF, the Arroyo government entered into
a MoA with the MILF covering the same areas. The past few weeks manifested the sincerity, or rather the lack of it, of the
Arroyo government in responding to the historic demand of the Bangsamoro people for self-determination. The Arroyo government
made a show of insisting on the MoA with the MILF while leaving the MNLF - which is waiting for the long overdue review of
the implementation of the peace agreement - hanging in the balance, and at the same time, pushing through with the ARMM elections
with its political allies in Mindanao taking control over the ARMM. By doing so it is dividing the Bangsamoro people.
Worse,
it is trying to provoke a conflict between Moro and Christian communities by making the MILF believe that the MoA is a done
deal while keeping the provisions of the agreement a secret thereby unsettling Christian and Lumad communities.
And
for what? A lot of people think the Arroyo government is merely providing an excuse for pushing for charter change to keep
itself in power beyond 2010. Obviously, the Arroyo government is the second interest group. It claims that its only
purpose in pushing for charter change is to achieve peace in Mindanao. But its actions belie its supposed intentions.
If it
genuinely wanted to achieve peace in Mindanao, it could have settled the unresolved issues with the MNLF early on. This
is not to say that the MNLF and MILF are one and the same and that solving the problems with the implementation of the MNLF
peace agreement would likewise resolve the conflict with the MILF. But if the government was not able to implement the peace
agreement with the MNLF, which required less concessions from it, how can it be relied on to implement the MoA with the MILF?
Besides both the MNLF and the MILF are working for the benefit of the whole Bangsamoro people. Which brings us to the next
point.
Why
is it that after more than 30 years of the Tripoli agreement and more than ten years after the signing of the Final Peace
Agreement, the Bangsamoro people remain marginalized, oppressed and in a deteriorating state of poverty? How could things
be different if the MoA and a final peace agreement is signed with the MILF? If the government is serious in working
for peace and development in Mindanao it could have addressed the problems of marginalization and poverty besetting the Bangsamoro
people early on. But it did not. And now it is suddenly concerned with peace in Mindanao. Did it experience an
epiphany of sorts that it suddenly decided to become magnanimous or is the government taking the MILF for a ride? Why
is it in a hurry to forge a deal with less than two years before it is supposed to step down? Why is there a sudden urgent
need to shift to a federal system of government?
This
government has never been known to uphold democratic processes or people’s rights. On the contrary, during the
last seven years of its rule, all it did was to keep itself in power at all costs through political maneuvering and through
bribing, rewarding and accommodating politically its allies, and harassing, killing and abducting its critics. Perhaps that
is not all it did because it has also been involved in numerous corruption scandals. That is why, it is to Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo’s
interest to keep itself in power beyond 2010 or to at least ensure that an ally would succeed her
The
third interested party is the US. More than half of aid from the US government is pouring into Mindanao. US troops
have established a continuous presence in Mindanao since 2001 through the Balikatan joint military exercises as well as for
“trainings” through the Joint Special Operations Task Force Philippines. The US is as interested in bringing
democracy and development to the Bangsamoro people as much as it does with the Iraqi and Afghan people. After all, the Philippines
was declared by the US as the “second front in the war against terror.”
The
positioning of the US in Mindanao is all about geopolitics, securing US interests in the region, and access to the island’s
rich natural resources, including oil and natural gas. The report that Eid Kabalu of the MILF hinted that US authorities
approached them to secure their agreement to the establishment of US bases in Mindanao once a final peace agreement is forged
is not surprising.
The
Bangsamoro people is dealing with forces that have oppressed it for centuries, the US and the GRP. Worse, it is dealing
with an administration that knows no bounds in its greed for power and wealth, and does not respect any institution or process
in its efforts at political survival. It is also dealing with the almighty US that is deeply in crisis and is preoccupied
not with spreading democracy and development but with asserting its political-military hegemony and protecting its economic
interests. The involvement of the US in Mindanao is not about development, it is about its self-proclaimed “war
on terror.” The motive of the Arroyo government is not to grant genuine autonomy to the Bangsamoro people but to perpetuate
itself in power. And they have been pitting the Bangsamoro and the Filipino people against each other to achieve this.
How can the Bangsamoro people then achieve genuine peace and development under this government? Bulatlat
BY BENJIE
OLIVEROS ANALYSIS Vol. VIII, no. 28, August 17-23, 2008
____________________________________________________________________________________________
Senate,
House leaders call for ‘full force of law’ vs MILF
MANILA, Philippines -- The leaders of the Senate
and House of Representatives on Monday urged the government to come down hard on the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF)
for attacking five towns in Lanao del Norte province.
But other lawmakers urged caution, calling
on the government and Moro rebels to immediately call a truce and resume peace talks.
The attacks came a day after the rebels ambushed
an Army convoy in Mulondo town, Lanao del Sur province, leaving seven soldiers killed and 12 others wounded, and a week after
military offensives dislodged hundreds of rebels from North Cotabato province.
"The Armed Forces of the Philippines should
undertake punitive action against the MILF forces involved and uphold the rule of law. We cannot afford renewed armed hostilities
because this will only set back efforts to bring economic and social progress to Muslim Mindanao," Senate President Manuel
Villar said in a statement.
He denounced the MILF for launching the attacks
despite an existing ceasefire.
At the House, Speaker Prospero Nograles, in
a separate statement, called the attacks on the Lanao del Norte communities acts of “terrorism” that should be
condemned by everyone, including the MILF leadership.
“These acts of criminality and terrorism
by rebel Muslim groups should be dealt with quickly and met frontally with the full force of the law,” he said.
“The government and our armed forces
cannot afford now to deal with kid's gloves [with] this kind of situation,” Nograles said. “We want peace but
when terrorism is the result of peace negotiations, the terrorists must be stopped and subdued at all cost.”
“The rampage being done by the MILF group
clearly shows criminal terrorism by any definition. It’s time to throw the statute books and enforce our laws on terrorism.
There is no other way to deal with this situation,” he said in a text message.
But Anak-Mindanao Representative Mujiv Hataman
called for “the immediate cessation of hostilities in Lanao.”
“We condemn the death, injury, [hostage
taking] and displacement of innocent civilians. The safety and security of their lives and property must not be risked at
any cost. We, therefore, call for ceasefire and resumption of peace talks,” Hataman said.
Bayan Muna (People First) Representative Satur
Ocampo also said he did not believe an all-out offensive against the MILF is necessary and urged government to calibrate its
responses against the Moro rebels.
“If it upholds the primacy of the peace
process, the government must calibrate its responses to MILF-initiated attacks. Otherwise, it would violate the ceasefire
agreement,” Ocampo said.
Villar also urged President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo
to immediately release money from the government’s Emergency Fund so relief assistance, like food, medicine, and counsel,
be provided the affected people.
"With another war in their midst, many of our
brothers and sisters in Mindanao, particularly in Lanao Del Sur and Lanao Del Norte, fear for the safety of their loved ones.
Immediate resolution and a return to normalcy is urged the soonest time possible," he said.
"Let's keep in mind that peace and prosperity
in Mindanao will eventually result in the welfare, stability and security of the entire Philippines," he added.
At the same time, Villar appealed to government
agencies, particularly the Departments of Social Work and Development and of Health, the Commission on Human Rights, and local
government officials, as well as non-government organizations, to ensure the safety of residents fleeing the areas of firefight.
"Evacuation procedures should be carried out
in orderly fashion. Innocent civilians should not be caught in the crossfire between the military and forces of the MILF…Massive
relief must be done now," he said.
Nograles said government cannot pursue peace
with the MILF if the rebel leadership could not control their own ranks on the ground.
“We really have to know first from the
MILF leaders if they are still in control. Those who are out of line should be relieved from their posts and should be punished
by the MILF leadership for breaking the chain-of-command,” the Speaker said.
By Veronica Uy, Maila Ager INQUIRER.net First Posted 15:58:00 08/18/2008
_________________________________________________________________________________________
US troops join search for unexploded bombs in conflict area
BALIKI, Midsayap, North Cotabato (MindaNews/18 August) –
Four American soldiers on board two silver Toyota Hilux Vigo vehicles with “VFA” plates in lieu of plate numbers,
joined the search for unexploded bombs here Sunday morning, detonating a recovered unexploded 500-pounder GP (general purpose)
bomb.
A sergeant belonging to the Philippine Army’s
Explosives Ordinance Disposal Team (EODT) told MindaNews two 500-pounder GPs dropped from OV-10 Broncos the previous Sunday
(August 10) did not explode. He said they had found the tailend of the bomb and were still scouring the area for the warhead.
GP
bombs are also referred to as “dumb bombs.”
The firefight
early morning of August 10 and the air strikes that followed triggered a mass exodus of villagers from neighboring areas,
including several barangays in Pikit and Aleosan towns.
Lt. Col.
Diosdado Carreon, commanding officer of the 40th Infantry Battalion based in Aleosan had earlier Sunday morning
told MindaNews it was safe to go interior as the road to Puypoyon had been cleared.
Barangay
Baliki was among the areas of fighting between government and Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) forces from late July until
the air strikes on August 10.
MindaNews
wanted to look into the reported burned houses in Sitio Puypoyon when the team chanced upon the US troops’ vehicles
on a hilly portion partly hidden by grasses.
The hilly portion turned out to be a detachment of the 38th
IB where the two silver Toyota Hilux Vigo vehicles were parked.
An American
soldier escorted by the Filipino sergeant emerged from downhill to get a container of mineral water and immediately returned
to where they came from.
The Filipino
soldier said "no photographs please, especially of the Americans," as he led the MindaNews team through booby traps, towards
the "impact area" where the joint RP-US team was scouring for the warhead and the other UXO (unexploded ordnance) about 500
meters of grassland away.
The soldier said four American soldiers joined the search for UXOs. He left the MindaNews
team behind to seek permission from the RP-US team across. He did not return.
A few minutes
later, ten Filipino soldiers and paramilitary elements walked towards where the MindaNews team waited, bringing their pails,
shovels, spades and the dug tailend of the 500-pounder GP bomb (see photo).
Another
five minutes later, at around 10:15 a.m., a man who identified himself as Lt. Hermosura, intelligence officer of the 40th
IB, walked from the “impact area” to where the MindaNews team and the 10 Filipino soldiers and paramilitary elements
waited, warning everyone to move out since the team across was going to detonate the unexploded bomb
The other
half of the bomb had been found, he said.
The impact
area of the explosion, he said, is about 700 meters.
Hermosura
said the bomb would be detonated to ensure it does not fall in the hands of the MILF.
MindaNews
sent Carreon a text message asking if he 40th IB sought the assistance of the American soldiers to look for UXOs
or unexploded ordnance. Carreon replied, “no idea.” He said the Army division has control over the
EOD.
MindaNews
saw the American soldiers dining at Ybelle’s in Poblacion 3, Midsayap at around 6 p.m. Sunday before proceeding to the
Hill Park Inn where they had been staying for a couple of days.
At breakfast
around 7 a.m. Monday (August 18), MindaNews chanced upon one of the Americans, a Caucasian with clean-shaven head and a moustache,
waiting for his breakfast at the hotel’s restaurant
But when
MindaNews approached the American and gave the appropriate introductions, he said, “I don’t talk to reporters.”
US troops
left the Philippines and their air and naval bases in 1991 when the Philippine Senate rejected the treaty extending their
stay.
But the
Philippine Senate under the Estrada administration ratified the Visiting Forces Agreement with the United States on May 27,
1999.
The VFA
took effect on July 1, 1999, allowing for the return of the US troops back in the country, although on “temporary”
status.
US troops
arrived in the country via Mindanao’s Basilan and Zamboanga in early 2002. They were supposed to have stayed only
for six months. While the majority has left, several teams of American soldiers remained on a “semi-continuous”
presence.
Then US
Ambassador to Manila Francis Ricciardone explained to MindaNews in a February 2005 interview that they have “established
a semi-continuous, not permanent, but semi-continuous (military presence)… some number of our personnel rotate at the
pleasure of … your command.”
Protests
against the holding of Balikatan 02-1 in Zamboanga and Basilan in 2002 did not stop the exercise but led to the signing
of a Terms of Agreement (ToR) that specified the number of troops from both countries, the scope and limitations
of the visiting US troops.”
The ToR
also specified that US troops “shall remain at the Battalion Headquarters and, when approved, Company Tactical Headquarters
where they can observe and assess the performance of the AFP forces.”
No ToRs have since been forged and each
time Philippine and American military officials are asked, they refer to the 1999 VFA and the 1951 Mutual Defense Treaty.
(Carolyn O. Arguillas/MindaNews)
Monday, 18 August 2008 09:23
_________________________________________________________________________________
MoA on Ancestral Domain: It's Not Over, Yet
The strong
backlash ignited by the MoA deserves a second look by the MILF leaders. A lesson that can be drawn is the fact that the war
for self-determination involves not only taking arms and talking but also a political war to win the broadest support for
the just and historic struggle of the Bangsamoro people.
The Memorandum of Agreement (MoA) on
Ancestral Domain between the Philippine government and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) does not automatically bind
the Arroyo government to honor the territorial claim of the Bangsamoro people in Mindanao, Palawan, and Sulu. If there is
any clear commitment made by the Philippine government based on the MoA, it is on explicit assurances that under any final
accord with the MILF the property rights and investments of big landowners, transnational corporations, and foreign powers
that are formalized in a myriad of agreements and treaties will be protected.
As to the ancestral domain, territories
and resources, and authority of the Bangsamoro Juridical Entity (BJE) – all of these are subject to the yet-to-be cobbled
Comprehensive Compact due in November 2009, a plebiscite, and charter change which are foreseen to be acrimonious and drawn-out
in the coming years.
The MoA on Ancestral Domain, a by-product
of a series of peace talks and agreements between the Arroyo government and the MILF since 2001, was to be signed by both
parties on August 5 in Malaysia where the talks are being hosted by the Kuala Lumpur government. It was stopped by a temporary
restraining order (TRO) issued August 4 by the Supreme Court (SC) acting on a petition filed against the MoA by local executives
and politicians in Mindanao.
The MoA was hastily put together under
instructions made to the government panel by Malacanang to come up with an agreement which the President would show as her
"legacy of peace" during her State-of-the-Nation Address on July 28. A temporary deadlock in the talks changed all that, however.
But the paper had to be drafted anyway by both parties under pain of losing the International Monitoring Team (IMT). Malaysia,
which heads the IMT that is overseeing a ceasefire, had threatened to end the team's tour of duty on August 31 unless progress
is made in the talks.
Secrecy
The street protests generated by the
agreement particularly in Mindanao this week were inevitable in a peace process shrouded with secrecy. Although the positions
of both government and MILF on the issues under negotiation have been well-publicized, the contents of the MoA were kept under
wraps until a former AFP general privy to the peace talks reportedly leaked the document to test the waters, so to speak.
Basically, the MoA is a set of consensus
points forged together by the two negotiating panels in the roadmap to peace that will culminate in the Comprehensive Compact.
The next discussions after the MoA signing will prove to be more contentious as both sides tackle the specifics of the territorial
and maritime resources claimed by the MILF covering, aside from the expanded Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao (ARMM),
about 1,000 barangays (villages). Other discussions are on the mechanics and modalities of the BJE; the final scheduling of
the local plebiscite among peoples including indigenous peoples and other non-Muslims covered by the Bangsamoro homeland;
and, finally, amending the charter to establish a new federal system (with the Bangsamoro as a federated state) and parliamentary
government that will be ratified nationwide in a second plebiscite.
Now that the contents of the MoA are
out, with many pressure groups in Mindanao calling it a "sell-out," the next negotiations should anticipate a storm of fireworks
and a possible derailment. The tit-for-tat in the SC dealing on the MoA's constitutional implications would be interesting
to observe. Knowing, however, the high court's well-established deference to the chief executive's policy imperatives, it
will likely rule in favor of the government no matter the insurmountable political backlash it would create.
But should the MoA, in the first place,
be considered as a breakthrough in the Bangsamoro people's historic struggle for self-determination? A closer scrutiny of
the unsigned agreement reveals that while the Philippine government pledges to recognize the ancestral domain claim of the
Bangsamoro people in motherhood principles it appends several conditions. Among others, the conditions are: First, it exempts
territories covered by "government projects or any other voluntary dealings entered into by the government and private individuals,
corporate entities, or institutions." Second, although the BJE has jurisdiction and control over potential sources of energy
including oil and natural gas, these will remain under the operation of the central government "in times of national emergency"
or "when public interest so requires." Third, although the autonomous Bangsamoro government may engage in economic and trade
relations with other countries, the central government reserves its jurisdiction on "external defense."
Excluded
As formulated, these conditions effectively
exempt from the ancestral domain and BJE authority the mining, forest, and other resource areas covered by existing laws,
executive agreements, and policies in favor of foreign corporations, local landowners, and other non-Muslim stakeholders.
Likewise, the central government can always invoke "emergency situation" and "national interest" to exercise authority over
energy resources.
Moreover, the presence of foreign military
forces is also guaranteed in pursuit of the central government's "external defense" responsibility. The presence of U.S. troops,
special operations forces, basing facilities, and surveillance systems in Moro-dominated areas and waters is guaranteed by
the Visiting Forces Agreement (VFA) and other agreements signed secretly by Arroyo with the U.S. government since 2002 which
the MoA implicitly honors.
Arroyo officials claim that the President
aims to sustain the momentum of the peace process with the MILF until her term ends in June 2010. Critics and anti-Arroyo
opposition groups are wary, however, that the peace talks are being calibrated to justify charter change en route to Arroyo's
extending her power as prime minister under a federal cum parliamentary system that will also formalize the Bangsamoro homeland
as a federated state. Considering that anti-Arroyo opposition groups are all gears for the 2010 elections, the Malacanang
agenda will likely end up as another debacle akin to the fate suffered by her two previous attempts.
The MILF, on the other hand, views the
MoA as a step forward for its goal of self-determination. Its leaders can always invoke the general concepts and principles
of the MoA on Ancestral Domain to pursue the MILF's political goal more so if they choose to declare unilaterally a separate
state later on.
But they should be pragmatic enough to
learn from the mistakes of the MNLF when, its armed strength weakened by strategic setbacks and factionalism, and abandoned
by its foreign backers, it forged a final peace accord 12 years ago that yielded neither real autonomy nor effective political
authority and development for the Bangsamoro people. Ever incremental in their objectives, the MoA – for that matter
the peace talks with Arroyo – is an incidental part of the MILF's 50-year jihad that its leaders declared in 2000. MILF
ground forces continue to train and hold on to their arms knowing that their struggle for self-determination includes fighting
and negotiating.
The strong backlash ignited by the MoA
deserves a second look by the MILF leaders. A lesson that can be drawn is the fact that the war for self-determination involves
not only taking arms and talking but also a political war to win the broadest support for the just and historic struggle of
the Bangsamoro people. A lot of hard work needs to be done in this area.
BY THE POLICY STUDY, PUBLICATION,
AND ADVOCACY Center for People Empowerment in Governance (CenPEG) Posted by Bulatlat Vol. VIII, No. 27, August 10-16,
2008
______________________________________________________________________________________
Air Force planes bomb MILF lair
‘Eyeball-to-eyeball’
fighting in Cotabato
PIKIT,
NORTH COTABATO—Philippine Air Force planes Sunday bombed suspected Moro rebel positions and ground troops pounded them
with cannons and mortars after hundreds of guerrillas defied a government ultimatum to withdraw.
Eyewitness accounts put government casualties at three dead, while officials said one Moro Islamic Liberation Front
(MILF) rebel was killed in the clashes that erupted mainly in North Cotabato province.
Armed Forces Vice Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Cardozo Luna said fighting was taking place “eyeball-to-eyeball”
in some areas and that the military and police were “prepared for a long drawn-out action,” Agence France-Presse
reported.
Some 500 guerrillas were involved in the fighting with Army units, including those from the 602nd Brigade, the 40th
Infantry Battalion, and 7th Infantry Battalion, according to Brig. Gen. Jorge Segovia, acting AFP command center chief.
Military reports mentioned no deaths among soldiers but said at least six of them were wounded in skirmishes that
occurred in areas largely outside the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (ARMM), where regional elections were to be held
on Monday.
There was no indication that the new flare-up was directly related to the ARMM elections. But some of the fighting
spilled over to two villages in Northern Kabuntalan, in Shariff Kabunsuan, where the rebels suffered one dead, according to
Chief Supt. Joel Goltiao, the ARMM police director.
Thousands flee
The weeks-long tension has forced some 100,000 villagers to flee their homes, relief officials in North Cotabato said.
Guided by troops on the ground, OV-10 Broncos, SF-260 planes and MG-520 attack helicopters hammered MILF positions
in North Cotabato with 260-pound bombs and rockets, a senior PAF official monitoring the military operation said.
“We already launched air operations using OV-10s, MG-520s and SF-260s. Bombs, rockets and machine gun fire were
delivered to targets given by ground troops,” said the official, who asked not to be named because he was not in charge
of releasing statements to the media.
The bombs were dropped in the area “of the 105th Base Command of the MILF, which is out of control already,”
the official told the Philippine Daily Inquirer (parent company of INQUIRER.net).
Further air strikes were expected until MILF troops heeded the government’s demand for a pullout.
Withdrawal
ordered
The government had given about 800 guerrillas until 10 a.m. on Friday to vacate several villages they had occupied
supposedly in violation of a 2003 ceasefire.
Officials accused the rebels of burning houses, destroying farms, stealing cattle and driving tens of thousands of
people from their homes.
The fresh conflict came at a crucial point in peace negotiations between the government and the MILF rebels, who have
reached an agreement calling for the establishment of an independent Bangsamoro homeland.
The formal signing of the accord was stopped last week by the Supreme Court, acting on petitions filed by Christian
politicians opposed to the inclusion of their areas in the proposed Muslim homeland.
On Saturday, the rebels were ordered by their leaders to pull back but later complained that their withdrawal was
hampered by government troops and armed villagers in areas where they were to pass. The rebels said some had sporadically
fired at them.
Ready for war
Lt. Col. Julieto Ando, spokesperson of the 6th Infantry Division, said the rebels under Commander Ombra Kato appeared
to have become renegades for defying their leaders’ order to pull out.
Hundreds of rebels from Maguindanao are fighting government forces in Barangays Tomado, Dungguan, and Dualing in Aleosan;
Barangay Tapudok and Kolambog in Pikit; and Barangay Baliki in Midsayap, all in North Cotabato.
“We are backing the local police in restoring normalcy in the area,” Ando said. “They (the rebels)
refused to obey their officials, therefore they are ready for war.”
Ando added: “We do not like war but we have the mandate to enforce the rule of law. The government has given
them enough time.”
‘Like New Year’
Col. Diosdado Carreon, chief of the 40th Infantry Battalion, said government forces had to fire howitzers in retaliation
for rebel attacks that began at 6 a.m.
North Cotabato Gov. Emmanuel Piñol said four of the soldiers were wounded by rockets and M-203 grenades fired by the
rebels.
“The firing went on without stop for an hour ... It seemed cannons were also being fired,” evacuee Severina
Dumag said in Filipino.
Rex Torino, reporter of Radio dxMS, said of the exchange of gunfire: “It was like it was the New Year.”
Torino said he saw three dead soldiers but military officials refused to identify them as their families still had
to be informed.
Result of miscommunication
Eid Kabalu, spokesperson for the MILF, said that “there was continuous shelling. I hope it will not escalate
to other areas.”
Kabalu said that before Sunday’s clashes, a mechanism for an orderly pullout should have been in place but there
was miscommunication between the two sides on the implementation of the withdrawal process.
“Our forces are moving out but still the Army and the civilian militia were running after them, so our troops
fought back as it is happening now,” Kabalu said.
In Aleosan, North Cotabato, motorists driving on the national highway in Pagangan village saw soldiers firing howitzers
from 9 to 11 a.m.
Heavy rains started at around 2:30 p.m. caused suspension of hostilities.
Cat and mouse
Segovia said that the military’s “surgical” strikes were confined to specific areas in Midsayap,
Aleosan, Pikit, and Libungan.
“These are adjoining towns, and because they are playing cat and mouse with government forces, where they will
leave one area and then return, the situation is very fluid,” Segovia said.
Segovia said the military action was not an “offensive” requiring the use of all military might but
a “clearing operation” in support of the PNP. With reports from Christine O. Avendaño in Manila, Edwin Fernandez,
Nash B. Maulana, Jeoffrey Maitem, Inquirer Mindanao, AP, AFP and Reuters
By Nikko Dizon, Tarra Quismundo Philippine Daily Inquirer,
Mindanao Bureau First Posted 01:33:00 08/11/2008
___________________________________________________________________________________________
Filipinos cutting back on food due to high cost -- survey
MANILA,
Philippines -- Filipino families have been cutting back on their consumption to cope with double-digit inflation, according
to a recent survey by Pulse Asia, Inc.
The
survey showed that two in three households (66 percent) were “consuming less of and/or spending less on” food,
while about one in four (24 percent) also said they had cut back on rice consumption or spending.
Aside
from food, Filipino households have also been consuming less of other items, such as electricity (53 percent), transportation
and transport fuel (32 percent), and liquefied petroleum gas (31 percent).
Among
households with cell phones (60 percent), about a fifth (22 percent) said they had also reduced their cell phone load expenses.
These
were the latest results released by the polling firm from its July 2008 Ulat ng Bayan survey. Earlier results from the same
Pulse Asia survey showed 75 percent of Filipinos saying they were worse off now than they were a year ago.
The
survey, conducted from July 1 to 14, 2008, used face-to-face interviews with a multistage probability sample of 1,200 adults.
It had a margin of error of plus-minus 3 percentage points.
Inflation
during the survey rose to a 17-year-high of 12.2 percent. It has been at double-digits since June when it jumped to 11.4 percent.
For
food items alone, inflation has been at double-digits since April (12 percent). It was 14.2 percent in May, 17.4 percent in
June and 18.6 percent in July. Rice prices increased 50 percent in July and 43 percent in June, compared with a year ago.
“Even
as reduced consumption has been the main strategy of about half of Filipino households in coping with high inflation, other
households sought additional sources of income (19 percent), borrowed money (10 percent) or dipped into their savings (10
percent),” Pulse Asia said in a statement released Wednesday.
The
high cost of living calls for prioritizing expenses, said Gerry Castillo, a barangay official in Las Piñas, told the Inquirer
in an interview that the high cost of living called for prioritizing expenses.
“We
only buy what is important,” Castillo said of his family. “We cut back on entertainment expenses, for example.”
Fe
Marcelo, a 39-year-old mother in Cubao, Quezon City, said she found the times to hard for her family of three.
Aside
from struggling to budget expenses to fit her family’s food needs, she could not “give as much” to her 15-year-old
daughter as before.
“For
example, this morning, I wanted to buy her some socks. I originally wanted to buy five, but because of budget constraints,
I could only buy three,” she said. “I usually avoid buying wholesale. I could still use the money left to buy
other important things.”
To
determine which items households have consumed less of or spent less on over the past three months, the survey asked the question,
“Which of the following have you consumed less or spent less on in the past three months?”
They
were presented the following choices and were instructed to choose only a maximum of three: food, rice, other foods aside
from rice, electricity, transportation/gasoline/diesel, LPG and cell phone load (for households with cell phones).
Households
that cut back on food consumption and/or expenditures increased by 22 percentage points since March, from 44 percent to 66
percent. The cutback on consumption and spending was “more widespread” in areas outside Metro Manila and among
the lower classes.
It
was 75 percent in the Visayas, 70 percent in Luzon outside Metro Manila and 61 percent in Mindanao. It was 71 percent among
class E and 66 percent in class D.
“Nevertheless,
[Metro Manila] and class ABC households also feel the impact of double-digit inflation rates,” Pulse Asia noted. The
percentage of households reducing food consumption in Metro Manila was 47 percent, while it was 48 percent among class ABC.
To
determine the impact of high prices on households, the survey also asked the question, “What is the main effect of the
price increases of commodities and services on your family?”
Respondents
were given the following choices and were instructed to choose only one: We reduced our consumption of other products or services
apart from food and education (26 percent); we reduced our food consumption (23 percent); we looked for an additional source
of income (19 percent); we borrowed money to meet the family’s expenses (11 percent); our savings was reduced (10 percent);
and we pawned or sold things to meet the family’s expenses (3 percent).
The
survey also found some 530,000 households (3 percent) having one or more of their members going “without food for at
least one whole day” during the month preceding the survey “primarily because the household had no money to buy
food.”
Of
those who said yes, 9 in every 10 (89 percent) said it was because “there was no money for buying food” -- the
reason of 91 percent of respondents in both class D and class E.
First
posted 21:46:10 (Mla time) August 06, 2008 Kate V. Pedroso Philippine Daily Inquirer __________________________________________________________________________________________
Youth seek 1M signatures for wage hike, vs oil deregulation
MANILA,
Philippines -- A youth group launched on Thursday a campaign to gather 1 million signatures to press their demand for a legislated
P125 across-the-board wage increase and repeal the Oil Deregulation Law.
The
signature drive of the Student Christian Movement of the Philippines (SCMP) is part of their “national campaign for
social justice amidst poverty and crisis,” said the group’s chair, Biyaya Quizon.
The
campaign was launched at Plaza Miranda in Manila, with SCMP members urging students, church goers, and pedestrians to sign
the petition.
“Now
more than ever, a wage increase is needed,” Quizon said. “We express our extreme disappointment with the statements
of Malacañang that it cannot allow another wage increase this year while the people are suffering everyday from the crisis.”
She
also said the government should scrap the Value Added Tax on oil if it really wants to help the poor.
“Junking
the VAT law will relieve the poor [from] paying too much for every single commodity they buy. How dare the Arroyo [administration]
boast of how the poor are provided the Katas ng [Benefits of] VAT [program] while it is the same tax that [is] squeezed out
of their empty pockets,” Quizon said.
After
gathering one million signatures, the petition will be forwarded to the House of Representatives and the Senate to “create
pressure for the immediate passage of the P125 bill and the repeal of the VAT law,” Quizon said.
SCMP
would also seek the help of the Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines (CBCP) in gathering signatures in parishes.
First
posted 13:55:34 (Mla time) August 07, 2008 Abigail Kwok INQUIRER.net _________________________________________________________________________________________
Mike Defensor mining deals stink -- green group
MANILA,
Philippines—An environmental group on Friday assailed the mining contracts bagged by two Philippine companies, headed
by President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo's former chief of staff Michael Defensor, and called for a congressional inquiry into
these.
“The
Defensor-Chinese mining deal stinks to high heavens,” Kalikasan-People's Network for the Environment national coordinator
Clemente Bautista said in a statement.
“That
Michael Defensor is getting a lot of favor from the Arroyo administration is revolting.”
Nihao
Mineral Resources Int'l and Geograce Philippines, both chaired by Defensor, signed a memorandum of agreement with China's
Jiangxi Rare Earth and Rare Metals Tungsten Group Co. to explore nickel and put up a $150-million nickel plant in Zambales.
The
President, who flew to Beijing to attend the Olympics Games opening, witnessed the MOA signing.
Kalikasan
said it was baffled how a small mining firm like Geograce could forge a multi-million-dollar deal with big firms.
It
said that in the first quarter, Geograce incurred a net loss of P17.18 million due to exploration costs, professional fees,
salaries and rent and utilities expenses, among others.
Geograce
has a claim to 142,376 hectares of mineral lands, the group said.
``It
is baffling how a small mining company and without track record in the mining industry like Geograce could get multimillion
mining deals with big foreign mining companies and how these mining companies of Mike Defensor were given hundreds of thousands
of hectares of mineral lands by the Arroyo government,” Bautista said.
The
background and operation of Defensor's companies should be investigated by the Senate and the House of Representatives, he
said.
``The
presence of high government officials and their relatives in these mining transactions could be a sign that the Arroyo administration
and its cronies are making profit out of the country's mineral resources without being mindful if these projects would be
beneficial to community or not,” he said.
Under
the MOA, the three companies would form a strategic partnership to jointly explore and develop the Zambales mining holdings
covering a total of 35,496.6 hectares, which are directly or indirectly held by Nihao and Geograce.
The
INQUIRER tried but failed to reach Director Horacio Ramos of the Mines and Geosciences Bureau for comment.
Bautista
said that Defensor's closeness to the President could explain how ``his mediocre companies were very 'lucky' in getting several
mining concessions and lucrative mining deals.”
In
June this year, Defensor's companies obtained small-scale mining permits from the Zambales provincial government a month after
the governor canceled all ``regulatory approvals,” he said, citing news reports.
Geograce
also forged mining agreements with the Brazilian-owned Vale, Masbate 13 Philippines, Nickelodeon Mines and Ophiolite Mines.
``There
is something wrong with the picture of GMA (Arroyo) overseeing an agreement between a once notorious DENR Secretary currently
affiliated with a small mining company and a large mining company,” Bautista said.
``It
seems that the present government is selling the country's patrimony to foreign companies but not without ensuring that local
allies also get a huge share of the plunder," he added.
First
posted 23:04:14 (Mla time) August 08, 2008 TJ Burgonio Philippine Daily Inquirer ________________________________________________________________________________________
SC stops MOA signing
MANILA,
Philippines -- The Supreme Court has stopped the signing of the memorandum of Agreement between the government and the Moro
Islamic Liberation Front over ancestral domain and set the hearing on August 15, its spokesman said.
The
high tribunal also ordered the executive to provide the court and the parties that petitioned concerned a copy of the MOA
not later than August 8, said lawyer Midas Marquez, information chief of the Supreme Court, Monday.
“The
court issued a TRO [temporary restraining order] restraining the respondents from signing the MOA,” Marquez told reporters,
hours after the high tribunal met in an en banc session to deliberate on the petition filed by officials of North Cotabato
who asked for a full disclosure of the contents of the MOA ahead of its signing.
The
court also discussed the allegations of bribery at the Court of Appeals involving the settlement of the dispute between the
Manila Electric Co. and the Government Service Insurance System.
Shortly
after the high court started its session, government, through Solicitor General Agnes Devanadera, sent its comment to the
North Cotabato petition, Marquez said.
The
government had tried to invoke executive privilege in its 26-page comment, saying while negotiations with the MILF did not
involve any foreign power, there were military and national concerns that were raised.
“This
being so, the entire process, the negotiations involving the said MOA and the drafts, documents thereof resulting from said
negotiations is covered by the doctrine of executive privilege, which prevents the disclosure of information that could subvert
military or diplomatic objectives,” the solicitor general said.
The
government lawyers said while it recognizes the right of the petitioners to information, "they do not have an unfettered access
to everything as these rights are subject to certain limitations."
"Notably,
there are matters which, despite their being of public interest and concern, are considered privileged in nature," Devanadera
said.
The
high court also consolidated a petition filed Monday by officials of Zamboanga City with that filed by the North Cotabato
executives
The
petitioners from North Cotabato are Governor Jesus Sacdalan and Vice-Governor Emmanuel Piñol. Those from Zamboanga are city
Mayor Celso Lobregat, and Representatives Isabelle Climaco and Erico Basilio Fabian.
The
petitioners asked the high court to prevent the signing of the MoA until they are given copies of the documents.
First
posted 17:51:03 (Mla time) August 04, 2008 Tetch Torres INQUIRER.net
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Teachers’
group gives Arroyo failing mark
MANILA,
Philippines -- For failing to tackle the worsening education crisis and their job concerns in her State of the Nation Address
(SONA), President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo was given a failing grade by the country's public school teachers.
The
President "has chosen to turn a blind eye to the worsening education crisis and a deaf ear to the teachers' clamor for better
pay in the face of dire economic conditions," the militant Alliance of Concerned Teachers (ACT) said on Thursday.
"Mrs.
Arroyo confirmed once again that the SONA is indeed the magic portal to an enchanted kingdom. Listening to (last Monday's)
speech will leave you with the impression that it's all business as usual in the education sector," ACT chair Antonio Tinio
told the Philippine Daily Inquirer, parent company of INQUIRER.net.
The
President failed to mention "the huge decline in participation rates among school-age children," said Tinio, adding over three
million children from six to 15 years old have been out of school.
Last
week, the National Statistical Coordination Board said that one in six school-age children have been deprived of education
and the number was rising steadily.
In
a study, the NSCB also disclosed that the percentage of children enrolled in primary schools was down to 83 percent in the
2006-2007 school year from 90 percent five years earlier.
The
numbers were even worse for secondary education at 59 percent, though they have been steady over five years, said the same
study.
According
to the NSCB, the number of Filipino children who did not have access to primary education worsened to 16.8 percent of the
school-age population in the schoolyear ending 2007 from 15.6 percent the previous year because of the rising cost of living.
The
NSCB said the failure of the country to send more of its school-age children to school kept it offtrack of the government's
targets under the Millennium Development Goal that all Filipino kids would have access to basic education by 2015.
Education
Secretary Jesli Lapus said they have been "squarely addressing the situation."
But
Lapus also said that the latest Department of Education survey for school year 2007-2008 showed an improvement with a participation
rate of 85 percent.
"This
has, in fact, prodded us to intensify our Oplan Balik Eskwela (Operation Back to School) and Brigada Eskwela (School Brigade)
program to encourage parents to send their kids to school at no cost...We've also asked local government units to come up
with anti-truancy ordinance so parents will ensure their children's constant presence in school," he said.
Lapus
expressed hope the DepEd "can count on the support of organizations such as ACT in educating the public on key education issues."
On
Thursday, Tinio said Arroyo had yet to do anything to improve school participation rates beyond giving out a few scholarships.
He
referred to "numerous flaws and limitations in the government's system of vouchers and subsidies, which Mrs. Arroyo mentioned
in her speech."
"But
they are only available for high school. There's no equivalent for elementary. They are also limited in scale," Tinio said.
The
ACT leader said that while millions needed assistance, only about 200,000 students have been benefitting from aid.
"And
lower middle class students of private high schools are the main beneficiaries, not the poor who are dropping out," Tinio
pointed out, referring to the subsidies given to some students who enroll in private schools with low tuition rates to ease
the pressure on public schools.
Tinio
also scoffed at the President's "expression of caring for the plight of public school teachers in her SONA."
"If
she truly cares, then why has she totally ignored our demand for a P9,000 increase that will give teachers decent salaries
and restore the status of the teaching profession? It seems that she cares more for military and police personnel to whom
her administration has granted substantial hikes in pay and benefits over the years," the ACT head added.
First
posted 20:06:07 (Mla time) July 31, 2008 Jerry E. Esplanada Philippine Daily Inquirer
________________________________________________________________________________________
Protesters hold funeral march to Senate vs JPEPA
MANILA,
Philippines -- Around a hundred members of environmentalist group marched on Monday from the Manila Film Center to the Senate
in Pasay City to urge senators not to ratify the controversial Japan-Philippines Economic Partnership Agreement (JPEPA).
Clad
in black to express their mourning, members of the EcoWaste Coalition, braved the rains, carrying a white casket as they walked,
accompanied by a band playing a dirge.
"We'd
like to remind senators that they are duty-bound to protect all aspects of Philippine life from unjust treaties like JPEPA.
We should not allow Japan to take us by a noose like a cow thinking it is being prepared for slaughter," said Manny Calonzo,
president of the group.
“The
JPEPA is an unjust and immoral treaty that spells death of the Philippine’s environment and economy,” said lawyer
Richard Gutierrez, executive director of the Ban Toxics group, which is affiliated with EcoWaste.
EcoWaste
and other environmentalist fear the JPEPA will turn the country into a dumping ground of toxic industrial waste from Japan,
despite assurances from the Senate that Japan has signed a “side agreement” that commits it to respecting the
country’s environmental laws.
The
leftist Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang Mamamalakaya ng Pilipinas (Pamalakaya, National Strength of the Fishers’ Movement
in the Philippines), meanwhile, said the ratification of the JPEPA would kill the local tuna industry, on which 180,000 fishermen
and their families depend.
The
fisherfolk group said the trade pact would also turn the country into a “dumping site” of second-hand Japanese
ships, like the ill-fated MV Princess of the Stars.
Gutierrez
called on the Senate to the JPEPA treaty and renegotiate for better terms that would protect the country’s social rights
and environment, stressing that they are not opposing economic trade with Japan, only “immoral and bad agreements”
that pose a threat to the country.
“Japan
will follow its self-interest regardless of a side-agreement,” Gutierrez said, adding that their group has received
reports Japan has allegedly undertaken both legal and illegal trading of toxic chemicals with India, Thailand, and other countries
in Southeast Asia.
Saying
the government cannot even control garbage disposal in the country, Gutierrez said there is no guarantee Japan will not import
toxic wastes once the JPEPA is ratified and in effect.
He
said that over the past decades, the Philippines has welcomed Japanese waste products disguised as “surplus” or
recyclable items, like television sets.
He
also worried that the government may not be able to summon the political will to enforce environmental laws because of the
“economic clout” wielded by Japan, the Philippines’ biggest trading partner.
Beau
Baconguis of Greenpeace Southeast Asia said the “majority of our senators have expressed that they have reservations
about this treaty -- even they cannot deny that JPEPA is unjust, unconstitutional, and heavily biased towards Japan’s
interests at the expense of Philippine sovereignty, economy, and environment.”
She
added that the Senate ratification of the JPEPA, “with full knowledge of its terrible flaws,” would mean the death
of the Philippines’ “dignity and aspirations as a nation.”
In
a statement Monday, Pamalakaya chairman Fernando Hicap said: “With the increase in the supply of tuna produced by Japanese
factory ships and their shipment to Japan and other countries, the local tuna producers and small tuna fishermen would be
at their mercy by way of depressed prices.”
He
said the local tuna industry generates some P18 billion.
As
for used Japanese ships, Hicap said, “It is now a fact…as admitted by [the] owners of Sulpicio Lines, that [the]
MV Princess of the Stars was acquired as a second-hand passenger and cargo ship for $5 million.”
The
passenger ferry, with more than 800 passengers and crew, capsized and sank off Romblon province after sailing into the path
of typhoon Frank (international codename: Fengshen) on June 21.
Hicap
blamed President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo for failing to address what he called the proliferation of second-hand Japanese vessels
sold to local businessmen.
First
posted 14:06:49 (Mla time) August 04, 2008 Abigail Kwok Katherine Evangelista INQUIRER.net
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Majority of Filipinos believe economy ‘worse now’--poll
MANILA,
Philippines -- Even as President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo continuously harps about a robust economy, 86 percent of Filipinos
believe that the economy is "worse now" than in 2005, while 75 percent say their personal quality of life worsened over a
one-year period, amid skyrocketing oil prices and record inflation, an independent survey showed.
Pulse
Asia Inc. asked 1,200 respondents nationwide to describe the state of the economy now, compared to how it was in 2005, and
86 percent said it was "worse now," 10 percent said it was the "same" while four percent said it was "better now."
In
its March survey, 66 percent said the economy was "worse now" compared to three years ago, 23 percent said it was the "same,"
while 11 percent said it was "better now."
"Despite
claims of economic growth by the national administration, 86% of Filipinos say the national economy has worsened in the last
three years -- a view articulated by big to overwhelming majorities (76% to 93%) across all geographic areas and socio-economic
classes," Pulse Asia said.
The
study, conducted from July 1 to 14, showed that 75 percent of Filipinos think their personal quality of life grew "worse"
compared to last year, while 84 percent said the national quality of life has worsened.
The
figures showed an increase from the 59 percent who saw their personal quality of life, and the 71 percent who saw the national
quality of life grow "worse" over a one-year-period during the last survey in March, Pulse Asia said.
Moreover,
Filipinos were growing "pessimistic" with 64 percent, saying that they expect their personal quality of life to be "worse"
next year, and 79 percent saying that they see the national quality of life worsening next year, it said.
The
figures also showed an increase in pessimism from the March Pulse Asia survey, wherein 37 percent said they expected their
personal quality of life to grow worse, and 52 percent said they expected the national quality of life to worsen.
The
survey firm polled 1,200 respondents nationwide for the study, which has a margin of error of +/3 percent at the 95-percent
confidence level.
Asked
to describe their personal quality of life, compared to the same period last year, 75 percent said they were "worse now,"
17 percent said they were "same as then," while only seven percent said they were "better now," Pulse Asia said.
Asked
how they viewed the national quality of life compared to last year, 84 percent said the nation was "worse now," 12 percent
said it was "same as then," while three percent said it was "better now," it said.
Pulse
Asia said there was "hardly any movement" in the percentage of respondents who considered their personal and national quality
of life as "better now" than last year.
Figures
showed that the percentage of respondents who considered the quality of life as "same as then," decreased, as the number of
those who saw the quality of life grow "worse" increased.
From
31 percent in March, 17 percent said their personal quality of life was "same as then" over a one-year period in July, and
from 23 percent in March, 12 percent said the national quality of life was "same as then" in July.
First
posted 14:17:45 (Mla time) July 30, 2008 Joel Guinto INQUIRER.net
________________________________________________________________________
Filipino scientists, activists want IRRI out
MANILA,
Philippines—Several groups of Filipino scientists and farmers Thursday slammed the Laguna-based International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), as it is doing "nothing good for Filipino farmers and Philippine agriculture."
"There
is no need for the IRRI to exist in the Philippines," said the groups Samahan ng Nagtataguyod ng Agham at Teknolohiya para
sa Sambayanan (Agham, Advocates of Science and Technology for the People) and Resist Agrochem TNCs (Resistance and Solidarity
Against Agrochemical TNCs).
IRRI
is the oldest and largest international agricultural research institute in Asia, established to develop improved rice varieties
and farming techniques.
"[IRRI]
continues to be the No. 1 perpetrator of anti-farmer rice research in Asia. Science and technology should be reoriented to
cater to the genuine needs of the farmers and the people," said Kilusang Magbubukid ng Pilipinas (KMP, Peasant Movement of
the Philippines) chair and Anakpawis Representative Rafael Mariano.
The
groups noted that IRRI, after the Green Revolution in the ’70s and its introduction of the high yielding varieties,
nearly wiped out the country's traditional varieties.
Currently,
they added, IRRI director general Robert Zeigler is calling for another green revolution, increased investments in rice research,
delivery of best technology to farmers and productive pro-poor public and private sector partnerships.
Zeigler
had said these were needed in response to the rice shortage in the country, which was a result of a convergence of events
such as rapid population and economic growth in Asia, decrease in farm lands and decrease in water supply.
However,
the group Resist Network stressed that the country could only attain true food security and self sufficiency that would genuinely
boost Philippine agriculture and productivity through the firm cooperation of farmers, scientists and other groups.
According
to Agham president Giovanni Tapang, Filipino scientists are "more than wiling to help in the development of Philippine agriculture
that serves Filipino farmers and pro-Filipino interests."
Scientists
affiliated with Agham and the Resist Network had thus given their support for the passage of House Bill No. 3059 or the Genuine
Agrarian Reform Bill (GARB) and HB No. 3058 or the Rice Industry Development Act (Rida).
Both
house bills are sponsored by militant partly-list representatives from Anakpawis, Bayan Muna and Gabriela.
Tapang
had stressed that "the GARB is the true solution to the age-old problem of landlessness and feudal exploitation in the country,
as well as to the exacerbating food crisis which brings further suffering to the hungry and impoverished Filipinos."
Bantay
Bigas convener Antonio Flores said the Rida will "pave the way for the development and protection of our rice industry into
a self-reliant and sustainable economic element of our national development and bring the country away from import-dependency
and food insecurity."
"To
resolve the present rice crisis and prevent another one, there is no other alternative but to push for genuine land reform,"
Flores added.
First
posted 18:55:53 (Mla time) July 24, 2008 Amy R. Remo Philippine Daily Inquirer
_________________________________________________________________________
Distrust hounds Arroyo on eve of SONA--Pulse Asia survey
MANILA,
Philippines--President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo will deliver her State of the Nation Address (SONA) on Monday with around one
in two Filipinos critical of her performance and distrusting her, according to an independent survey.
The
Pulse Asia Inc. study, conducted from July 1 to 14, showed that 48 percent "disapprove" of her performance, while 53 percent
had "small or no trust" in her.
The
figures "do not differ significantly" from the 51-percent disapproval rating and the 57-percent distrust rating that the President
scored in its March 2008 surey, Pulse Asia said.
Moreover,
35 percent said the pro-poor programs was part of "politicking" for the 2010 elections, it said.
The
survey firm polled 1,200 respondents nationwide. At around that time, the administration announced subsidies for the poor
which were sourced from Value Added Tax (VAT) revenues, continued to offer cheap rice from the National Food Authority (NFA),
and pushed for lower electricity rates.
Asked
to rate the President's performance, 48 percent said they disapproved, 22 percent approved, while 30 percent were undecided,
Pulse Asia said.
Disapproval
was highest in Mindanao (62 percent), followed by Metro Manila (50 percent), Luzon (48 percent), and the Visayas (31 percent).
The President registered the highest approval rating in the Visayas (35 percent), it said.
Asked
if they trusted the President, 53 percent said they had "small or no trust" in her, 19 percent said they had big trust, while
28 percent were undecided. Distrust was highest in Mindanao (64 percent), followed by Metro Manila (56 percent), Luzon (53
percent), and the Visayas (37 percent). Her trust rating was highest in the Visayas (32 percent) it said.
"Disapproval
for presidential performance and distrust in President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo remain the predominant public sentiment with
almost one out of every two Filipinos (48%) being critical of President Arroyo's performance and a small majority (53%) distrusting
her," Pulse Asia said in a statement.
While
the over-all figures were "essentially unchanged," Pulse Asia noted "marked movements" in the President's performance and
trust ratings across geographical regions and economic classes.
In
Metro Manila, the President's approval and trust ratings rose back to levels in October 2007, before the corruption controversy
over the botched ZTE-NBN deal broke last January, Pulse Asia said.
Twenty
percent of respondents in the capital said they approved of the President's performance, up from 11 percent in March 2008,
and close to the 21-percent approval rating in October, it said.
Another
17 percent said they trusted the President, up from six percent in March 2008, and close to the 18-percent trust rating in
October, it said.
Arroyo's
disapproval rating in the ABC income brackets improved by 16 percentage points to 45 percent in July, from 61 percent in March.
Her distrust rating also improved by 16 percentage points, to 49 percent from 65 percent during the same period, it said.
Asked
which pro-poor program of the government they have availed of, 49 percent said NFA rice, 43 percent said they did not receive
any, nine percent said they received the P500 one-time power bill subsidy, six percent said they benefited from the food for
school program, two percent said they received the P1,500 fertilizer subsidy for farmers.
Asked
why they thought administration was helping the poor, 35 percent said this was part of "politicking" for the 2010 elections,
30 percent said it was part of government's responsibility, 24 percent said the government wanted to help the poor in difficult
times, 10 percent said the government was preventing "possible conflict" that could arise from poverty.
The
survey had an error margin of plus or minus three percent.
First
posted 12:19:53 (Mla time) July 27, 2008 Joel Guinto INQUIRER.net
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Opposition
on real state of the nation: ‘RP a sinking ship’
MANILA, Philippines - A sinking
ship and a captain who is robbing passengers on board - this was how various groups described the "real" state of the nation
Wednesday, as it urged Filipinos to join protests during President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo's State of the Nation Address (SONA)
on July 28.
In a joint statement posted on the Bagong Alyansang Makabayan (Bayan) website, prominent opposition leaders criticized the administration's economic policies, including its insistence on imposing the
value added tax on oil which displays the government's "insensitivity towards the plight of the people."
The group
also scored the government's recent subsidy spree, saying these are "nothing more than dole-outs aimed at quelling unrest."
"For the people ... we hold a completely different version of the SONA. The real state of the nation is that of grinding
poverty and hunger, repression and widespread human rights violation, massive unemployment and sky-rocketing cost of living.
The real state of the nation is that of a sinking ship, whose captain robs then abandons all those on board," opposition figures
said.
"Mrs. Arroyo is responsible for some of the worst economic policies that have wrought ruin on the people. Her
insistence on imposing the Value Added Tax on oil smacks of gross insensitivity towards the plight of the people. Her so-called
targeted subsidies are nothing more than dole-outs aimed at quelling unrest. So far Mrs. Arroyo has refused to take any responsibility
for the mess her administration has created," the group added.
The group noted that President Arroyo will deliver her
SONA on July 28 amid high prices of food, fuel and other basic commodities, and persistent allegations of corruption.
Also,
they claimed the administration battle cry "Ramdam ang Kaunlaran (Progress is Felt)" has fallen flat on its face. Even the
rallying call "Labanan and Kahirapan (Fight Poverty)" has also been discredited as nothing more than political gimmickry,
they added.
"This year's SONA by Mrs. Arroyo will not bring any hope for the people. As in previous SONA
|